Agenda - 10-06-20; 6-c - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)

Browse Search

Approved 9/2/2020 only 60 feet from where the trucks will be queuing up and their playground is 100 feet from where the trucks will be 782 queuing up on David Road. There was a similar development that was a third the size of this development and the 783 closest resident as 550 feet from the nearest loading dock. The noise impact analysis that was done still required 784 reduced traffic even at the greatly reduced numbers and distances compared to the proposed development. I’d like 785 to add that diesel trucks typically use engine breaking that create an extremely loud machine gun like noise as much 786 as 105 decibels. These noises are only regulated during the day in Orange County and stand to create massive 787 disruptions to the preschool and the residents especially on David Road. 788 789 Myra Gwin-Summers: I am Myra Gwin-Summers, we live two doors down from the proposed property on the corner 790 of Davis Road. We’ve been here for about 35 years and I see that I was down to speak on property values which 791 was not what I intended to speak on but would quickly say I cannot imagine that this project would enhance anyone’s 792 property values. I have a questions and comments for Mr. Birch and I don’t know if he’s still present but I am going to 793 show this (visual of a mailing’s return address). Why did we receive a letter regarding this project that says it is from 794 the City of Raleigh Planning Department? Who paid for the postage and does the City of Raleigh Planning 795 Department know that he has represented this project to us as if it were from them? I received an answer to that 796 today, the City of Raleigh Planning Department has no connection with the project and were very interested in the 797 fact that Michael Birch is sending out letters to residents in our county using their return address. I would like to be 798 sure and highlight that Mr. Birch has misrepresented himself here and possibly used their taxpayer money for a 799 private investment project without the knowledge or consent of the City of Raleigh. It shows poor judgement at best 800 and lack of integrity. Moreover, it’s deceptive and it does beg the questions what else is deceptive about this project. 801 The next thing I wanted to address to Michael Birch, I’d like from you regarding your use of the City of Raleigh 802 Planning Department on your return mail address. I wanted to speak specifically to comment that you made that can 803 be found on page 25 of the draft minutes, lines 1226 thru 1230 when Mr. Birch was questioned about the buffers and 804 the encroachment of noise and vehicle lights due to the 24 hours 7 days a week activity. He responded that a lot of 805 the lots that surround us are deep lots with the houses situated far from the common boundary line. This is 806 completely false and the as speaker just pointed out, the driveway exit onto Davis Road runs right next to the 807 Barlow’s house and will run right next to the house that will be built behind us. Next, I’d like to say that I spoke to a 808 senior engineer at Summit Engineering today who clarified for me that Summit has completely withdrawn their 809 project. They withdrew because the topography did not lend itself to large buildings it was going to be cost 810 prohibitive and they thought they would not actually be able to build the buildings. My final comment would be that 811 this is being addressed as if it is on zero grade, that’s not true the corner of Davis Road is a steep hill and I wanted to 812 make the Planning Board aware in case you’re not aware that Davis Road is closed for over 6 months last year due 813 to a sinkhole that is due to runoff on Davis Road. Once the corner of Davis Road is turned into an impervious 814 surface, the runoff is going to be more severe and could create more problems. 815 816 Michael Birch: I think there were two things to address, primarily about the return addresses. Let me be clear that 817 we paid, our firm paid for the postage, the City of Raleigh return address stamp was on those envelopes related to a 818 similar or prior projects that we were doing in Raleigh and was inadvertently used for the mailing for the notices for 819 this project. I will note that the letterhead, the letter the notice that was included in the envelope very clearly stated 820 that it was from Longleaf and didn’t have any reference to the City of Raleigh. I apologize for the confusion that it 821 may have caused to have the return address say City of Raleigh but we did pay for the postage and I have reached 822 out to the City of Raleigh to their Planning Director to let them know. We didn’t obtain any of their envelopes or 823 anything like that they have asked us in the past to put their return address on there for other mailings. The question 824 on the buffers, I want to be clear that when I was speaking to those in the last meeting we had the exhibit up showing 825 the buffers and the transition areas and again was very clear that the majority of our property does not abut parcels 826 with homes on it. The one that are nearby are deep lots but we did recognize that there is one existing home again 827 within 100 ft. of a proposed building and we did not shy away from stating that. 828 829 Joan Kalnitsky: My name is Joan Kalnitsky, I’d like to thank the Planning Board for listening to all of us this evening. 830 I doubt there’re are too many of us who really don’t believe the property in question will be developed but developing 831 it in the manner that has beneficial to the County and the Town of Hillsborough and the residents of Orange County is 832 really important. As almost immediate access to the highways and all four directions, with seemingly little impact to 833 the local area, with that said, I am seriously urging the Planning Commission to not support rezoning of this property. 834 I am asking this for safety reasons, people on the Board of the Planning Commission and the applicant want us to 835 believe that the traffic is going to go left onto Davis Road and left onto Old 86 and not impact the area but truth is 836 traffic is also going to right down Old 86 and right down Davis Road. The roads we’re talking about are part of the 837 33