Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-06-20; 6-c - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 10-06-20; 6-c - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 2:20:28 PM
Creation date
10/1/2020 2:58:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/6/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-c
Document Relationships
Agenda 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Minutes 10-06-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> <br />turn for those folks that are using the service road then you’ll at about 200 U-turns in a peak hours because the 502 <br />majority of the traffic is going north. We have added the condition to do what we can on Davis to install signage 503 <br />prohibiting right hand turns onto Davis and we are installing a signal there at Davis and 86. But we are not in a 504 <br />position to agree to a condition that prohibits access onto Davis. 505 <br /> 506 <br />David Blankfard: That’s fine that is something that the County Commissioners would have to take up. We’re only 507 <br />doing recommendations. I understand that creates a challenge for the applicant for future but I think the County 508 <br />residents like their intersection at Davis and Old 86 even though it’s dangerous. They prefer it that way. Any other 509 <br />thoughts about my recommendation? 510 <br /> 511 <br />Melissa Poole: If David’s recommendation is not viable can there not be a sign placement coming out stating truck 512 <br />have to turn a certain way so as not to go down Davis. 513 <br /> 514 <br />David Blankfard: I don’t think they would ever turn right on Davis going down Davis. My concern is at that 515 <br />intersection of Davis and Old 86. That’s the bottleneck, no truck unless lost would turn right. 516 <br /> 517 <br />Kim Piracci: I feel like there was discussion of a traffic circle with Settler’s Pointe. Wasn’t that offered as a solution? 518 <br /> 519 <br />Christa Greene: A traffic circle would take a tremendous amount of right-of-way that would get out of the existing 520 <br />right-of-way when it was easily handled by a traffic signal with the existing configurations. 521 <br /> 522 <br />Craig Benedict: If I could also add the 2 roads we’re talking about Old 86 is an arterial road and DOT expects a 523 <br />certain amount of traffic on it per day and Davis Road is not a residential road it’s call a collector road. DOT does not 524 <br />restrict a collector road to residential traffic. It is allowed mixed traffic with no prohibitions so when the County and 525 <br />NCDOT and the metropolitan planning organization put together what is known as a comprehensive transportation 526 <br />plan, they take a look at these road networks and designate them for a certain amount of traffic to handle the traffic 527 <br />that is on land use plans. Davis Road is designated as a collector road and the traffic studies that have been put 528 <br />together show that there is capacity in that roadway to accommodate this project and the residential traffic that is in 529 <br />the general area. 530 <br /> 531 <br />David Blankfard: Let’s open this up to the public, as a reminder to the public you will have a 3-minute window for 532 <br />your comments. Please remember just to add new things, if we’ve already heard the complaints then please don’t 533 <br />repeat them, second is the last time allowed the conversation to become a little personal and not professional so I 534 <br />want to remind everyone to be polite to one another. If that can’t happen, I will mute you. 535 <br /> 536 <br />Stephen Williams: I just want to take to thank the Planning Board members here. It’s been nice to be able to see 537 <br />you on camera and to see the ones who are paying attention to what’s going on and those who are distracted by 538 <br />other things. I really appreciate the ones who have been involved and asked questions rather than just voting. 539 <br />Taking a vote and saying yes or no. It is nice to know that some people are concerned. I wanted to point out that I 540 <br />didn’t realize there was a sales pitch on the agenda by the Barrister Corporation. I also want to point out that I don’t 541 <br />have time to tell you my life story, education unfortunately like Ms. Greene did, I have 3 minutes. First, I wanted to 542 <br />say something about the map that the representative from Barrister shared with the stars on it about residences. 543 <br />One of those stars where he says no one is building or no one lives. I am currently building, I just broke ground on a 544 <br />new house last week. The star next to me, someone else just bought that property to build a house, not a 545 <br />corporation. I want you to consider a Walmart 100 feet from your house and tell me would you be okay with that. 546 <br />The closest building to a residence is 100 feet. That is the distance you’re supposed to stop behind a school bus, 547 <br />legally, 100 feet. Would you want your kid in that back yard? Would you want your mom in that back yard? Your 548 <br />elderly parent? I really want you to consider that. Also, I want to applaud Ms. Piracci. She made it pretty clear, we 549 <br />don’t know what’s going in these buildings but they do. No one builds 2.5 million sq. ft. at one time without knowing 550 <br />the tenants. That is a poor business decision so I find it very hard to believe that they don’t know. They don’t have to 551 <br />tell us, no legally, they don’t but they know. They absolutely know who’s going in there. The other thing I want to 552 <br />point out is that it’s not the traffic I’m worried about, it’s not the cars, it’s not trucks, its 18 wheelers that are going in 553 <br />and out of this business. You’re not just talking about a small vehicle. You’re talking about a loud, large vehicle at 554 <br />any time of the day. I will be asleep next door to this and I beg you to consider that. Also, in one of the slide shows 555 <br />by Ms. Greene, she talked about averages of business on what this would look like. I am a former employee of a fast 556 <br />food corporation, every business is different. Some Kentucky Fried Chickens I worked for averaged 50,000 dollars a 557 <br />28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.