Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> <br />Craig Benedict: No, it’s my understanding that the applicant has not agreed to Hunter’s verbiage but either what Mr. 278 <br />Marshall proposed or a version of what was proposed. Allow for incorporation was one of those alternate proposals 279 <br />or take the word unnecessarily out. In order to get this condition in there we have to come to an agreement with the 280 <br />applicant so one version is take the word unnecessarily out, shall not preclude incorporation of alternate energy 281 <br />systems. And the other one is Mr. Marshall’s shall allow for incorporation of alternate energy systems. Those are 282 <br />the two that are viable that if you want to include them with the other conditions the Board could vote on one of those 283 <br />versions and then you would be able to attach these conditions to the other elements of the MPD-CZ. 284 <br /> 285 <br />Adam Beeman: I propose building design/construction shall not preclude incorporation of alternative energy systems 286 <br />such as solar panels. 287 <br /> 288 <br />Hunter Spitzer: Second. 289 <br /> 290 <br />David Blankfard: All right, all in favor of that verbiage let me read it for you the way I understand it. Building 291 <br />design/construction shall not preclude incorporation of alternative energy systems such as solar panels. 292 <br /> 293 <br />Alexandra Allman: Second 294 <br /> 295 ROLLCALL VOTE: 296 <br />Melissa Poole: Yes 297 <br />Randy Marshall: Yes 298 <br />Patricia Roberts: Yes 299 <br />Carrie Fletcher: Yes 300 <br />Hunter Spitzer: No 301 <br />Kim Piracci: No 302 <br />Adam Beeman: Yes 303 <br />Susan Hunter: Yes 304 <br />David Blankfard: Yes 305 MOTION PASSED 8-2 306 <br /> 307 MOTION by Randy Marshall the addition of the three conditions be add to the proposal. Seconded by Adam 308 <br />Beeman. 309 <br /> 310 ROLLCALL VOTE: 311 <br />Melissa Poole: Yes 312 <br />Randy Marshall: Yes 313 <br />Patricia Roberts: Yes 314 <br />Carrie Fletcher: Yes 315 <br />Hunter Spitzer: Yes 316 <br />Kim Piracci: Yes 317 <br />Adam Beeman: Yes 318 <br />Susan Hunter: Yes 319 <br />David Blankfard: Yes 320 MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY 321 322 <br />The Applicant/Associates for the RTLP proposal give a couple of presentations 323 <br /> 324 <br />Kim Piracci: One clarifying question, when Frank was talking about the homes, the adjacent properties are mostly 325 <br />vacant and there are a few that have homes on them. I think the closest he said was 100 ft. It was unclear to me did 326 <br />he mean 100 feet from the property edge or that home to the building. 327 <br /> 328 <br />Michael Birch: To the building. 329 <br /> 330 <br />Kim Piracci: Ok, then the difficulties in our current economy were very nicely explained to us and how this 331 <br />development will alleviate those problems but creating jobs and paying taxes and whatnot but I have to say that with 332 <br />developers that don’t have the vision to develop buildings for the future, with clean technology, and charging stations 333 <br />24