Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-06-20; 6-b - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Parcels off Old NC Highway 86 (District 2 of Settlers Point MPD-CZ)
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 10-06-20; 6-b - Zoning Atlas Amendment – Parcels off Old NC Highway 86 (District 2 of Settlers Point MPD-CZ)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2020 2:19:03 PM
Creation date
10/1/2020 1:53:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/6/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-b
Document Relationships
Agenda 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2020\Agenda - 10-06-20 Virtual Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOTION by Randy Marshall to approve the February 5, 2020 Meeting Minutes. Seconded by Hunter Spitzer. 56 VOTE: Unanimous 57 58 <br /> 59 AGENDA ITEM 5: CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONS TO AGENDA. 60 <br />There were none 61 <br /> 62 <br /> 63 AGENDA ITEM 6: PUBLIC CHARGE 64 <br /> 65 <br /> INTRODUCTION TO THE PUBLIC CHARGE 66 <br /> The Board of County Commissioners, under the authority of North Carolina General Statute, 67 <br />appoints the Orange County Planning Board (OCPB) to uphold the written land development law of 68 <br />the County. The general purpose of OCPB is to guide and accomplish coordinated and 69 <br />harmonious development. OCPB shall do so in a manner, which considers the present and future 70 <br />needs of its citizens and businesses through efficient and responsive process that contributes to 71 <br />and promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the overall County. The OCPB will make every 72 <br />effort to uphold a vision of responsive governance and quality public services during our 73 <br />deliberations, decisions, and recommendations. 74 <br /> 75 <br />PUBLIC CHARGE 76 <br />The Planning Board pledges to the citizens of Orange County its respect. The Board asks its 77 <br />citizens to conduct themselves in a respectful, courteous manner, both with the Board and with 78 <br />fellow citizens. At any time, should any member of the Board or any citizen fail to observe this 79 <br />public charge, the Chair will ask the offending member to leave the meeting until that individual 80 <br />regains personal control. Should decorum fail to be restored, the Chair will recess the meeting 81 <br />until such time that a genuine commitment to this public charge is observed. 82 <br /> 83 <br /> 84 AGENDA ITEM 7: CHAIR COMMENTS 85 <br />There were none 86 <br /> 87 88 AGENDA ITEM 9: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT (GENERAL USE REZONING) - To review and make a recommendation to 89 <br />the BOCC on a County-initiated action to rezone 8 parcels totaling 45.96 acres from MPD-CZ 90 <br />(Settler’s Point) to EDH-4 (Economic Development Hillsborough Office/Retail) (1 parcel 32.76 91 <br />acres in size) or EDH-2 (Economic Development Hillsborough Limited Office) (7 parcels totaling 92 <br />13.2 acres). The parcels are located in Hillsborough Township, south of Interstate 40 and east of 93 <br />Old Highway 86. This item is scheduled for BOCC public hearing on September 15, 2020. 94 <br /> PRESENTER: Michael Harvey, Current Planning Supervisor 95 <br />Michael Harvey reviewed the abstract and proposed changes to the Zoning Atlas Amendment 96 <br /> 97 <br />David Blankfard: Anybody from the Board have any questions or comments? 98 <br /> 99 <br />Hunter Spitzer: My first question is in rezoning these parcels back to what they were prior to this, particularly on the 100 <br />east side of 86, could I recommend or ask for consideration to rezoning to low intensity to medium intensity 101 <br />residential in this area? It seems as though the industrial land uses are not very in line with the vision that the 102 <br />residents have and I would add this zoning in addition to the ones that you already have recommended and in place 103 <br />of Rural Residential this would allow for a more transition, a different opportunity for development in the area that I 104 <br />think would be more in line with what some people have voiced. 105 <br /> 106 <br />Michael Harvey: Thank you for the question, that suggestion in my opinion is inconsistent with the Comprehensive 107 <br />Plan, which identifies this area as Economic Development Transition. I also think that these property owners would 108 <br />object to (their property being) the down zoning of their property and loss of potential development value. These 109 <br />parcels have been zoned Economic Development for several decades. That it is not something that I am comfortable 110 <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.