Browse
Search
080520 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
080520 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 1:32:23 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 1:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 080520 Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> 1556 means of ingress/egress. At Settler's Point chose to try and secure access off Old NC Hwy 86 directly. That was a <br /> 1557 gamble they took and unfortunately it didn't pay off at the time they had the approval they couldn't negotiate an <br /> 1558 access point. I know that this applicant has looked for alternative access points and I'm not telling you this to say, it's <br /> 1559 a fait accompli, but I'm telling you this that one of the reasons there's two access points is because DOT has <br /> 1560 mandated it from day one. This applicant is obviously proposing Davis Road there's obviously concerns about that <br /> 1561 and there's request for more information and that needs to be processed to move forward but I think the Board just <br /> 1562 needs to be put back in the loop that the reason there's two is because DOT is mandating it. <br /> 1563 <br /> 1564 Michael Birch: This is Michael Birch, the applicant just to reiterate on the timing of DOT responses. We will hound <br /> 1565 them as best we can to get responses so we can this resolved in advance of a possible meeting on the 191h. <br /> 1566 <br /> 1567 Randy Marshall: I'm not sure we are going to continue to be productive tonight so I'd like to make a recommendation <br /> 1568 that we adjourn or postpone or continue the meeting until two weeks from tonight at 7 p.m. <br /> 1569 <br /> 1570 Hunter Spitzer: Seconded. <br /> 1571 <br /> 1572 Adam Beeman: I vote going ahead and solving the problem tonight if anybody else is ready to vote. I'm ready to <br /> 1573 vote. I'm got my choices made so if everybody else wants to shelve it that's fine but I'm ready to move forward <br /> 1574 tonight. <br /> 1575 <br /> 1576 Kim Piracci: I would like to postpone voting but to me it doesn't make sense to meet in two weeks if we haven't <br /> 1577 heard from the DOT though it could be a conditional two weeks from tonight sort of thing. <br /> 1578 <br /> 1579 Michael Harvey: Kim, let me just interject that it unfortunately can't be conditional you are going to be adjourning to a <br /> 1580 date and time certain so there will be a meeting if you all elect to do it this way on the 19th and if we don't have the <br /> 1581 response unfortunately we don't have the response and I hate to say it that way but it's the truth. The two options <br /> 1582 you have are to adjourn this meeting matter or table this matter until the September meeting which obviously the <br /> 1583 applicant I know has a concern with or to say you're going to attempt to do a special meeting on the 19th. If there's <br /> 1584 Board consensus to try that and we don't have answers, we don't have answers. That's the unfortunately blunt way <br /> 1585 I'm going to have to put it to you. <br /> 1586 <br /> 1587 Randy Marshall: Part of my thinking was that we still have a number of people who wanted to address this some of <br /> 1588 them we may have already have heard from and understand what their positions are but there may be others that <br /> 1589 we've not heard from at all and I'm not sure we want to start listening to them at this late time. The other things is <br /> 1590 we've not been able to address the DOT issues and nothing may change as Michael suggests in two weeks but at <br /> 1591 least in two weeks we will have a little bit more information and can get a little bit more input from the public and <br /> 1592 make an informed decision at that time. I can vote tonight, I know where I stand but I just want to make sure that <br /> 1593 everybody feels like they've had enough opportunity to get all the information they need or to provide all the <br /> 1594 information they need. <br /> 1595 <br /> 1596 David Blankfard: I think that we should postpone it to the 19th. I guess we'll have to have a motion again. But we'll <br /> 1597 wait and until the 19th we can listen to more of the constituents, the public right because they were saying they were <br /> 1598 not notified this will give them more time to rally their forces and then if the DOT isn't there, we'll just listen to the <br /> 1599 public and if the DOT we can finish it then and there. <br /> 1600 <br /> 1601 Craig Benedict: Perdita how many people do you have still want to speak tonight? <br /> 1602 <br /> 1603 Perdita Holtz: There are 14 people that have their hands raised. <br /> 1604 <br /> 1605 Adam Beeman: I have a question if we come back on the 191h and we don't have the information from DOT are we <br /> 1606 going to push it out again. <br /> 1607 <br /> 1608 David Blankfard: We'll just listen to the public. <br /> 1609 <br /> 1610 Adam Beeman: I understand that but are we going to push the vote out again or are we going to vote on the 19th? <br /> 1611 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.