080520 Planning Board Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Approved 9/2/2020 1500 if you all and I understand that you are all very opposed to this but in the off chance that it can't be stopped, you do 1501 have the opportunity to shape this development through this process and so I encourage you to consider what you 1502 might want to put in as conditions if at all possible. 1503 1504 David Blankfard: I have a huge concern about the traffic being dumped onto Davis Drive. Not just some of the traffic 1505 but everything is going to be dumped onto Davis Drive because NCDOT does not want anybody to come out the 1506 service road. So I don't know if anybody else feels that way or if we want to see if the applicant can come up with a 1507 better way of getting access to the site. Are we comfortable making a decision now or wanting to wait? 1508 1509 Hunter Spitzer: I move that we delay a decision on our recommendation until our next meeting on September 2nd. 1510 1511 Michael Birch: This is Michael Birch, the applicant, I think the outstanding issues that appear to be out there are one 1512 responses from DOT but I want to reiterate that whatever DOT comes back with in terms of requested improvements, 1513 those will be made. So it's not really a negation in that respect. Second with regard to some of the comments about 1514 Davis Drive, I just think it is not possible for us to prohibit access onto Davis Drive. Third, with regard to some of the 1515 comments or requests for the conditions the design of the buildings with intent to accommodate solar, providing 1516 some electric vehicle charging stations and no fuel storage adjacent to the flood plain. I am comfortable with we can 1517 craft those conditions and extremely short order and so I would respectfully ask but because of the date of the next 1518 Planning Board meeting being on the 2nd essentially eliminates our opportunity to get to the Board of Commissioner's 1519 meeting on the 15'". I would ask that the Planning Board please consider meeting or adjourning to a date certain 1520 possibly 2 weeks from today on the 19'h 1521 1522 David Blankfard: I think we could do the 19t"to reconvene. 1523 1524 Adam Beeman: I was going to ask Craig or Michael Harvey, with what Mr. Birch said about whatever DOT comes 1525 back and they're going to rectify whatever DOT says they need to do. Do you guys feel comfortable with moving 1526 forward knowing whatever DOT may say or would it be better to meet a date later once the DOT issues have been 1527 straightened out? 1528 1529 Craig Benedict: Let me just give a brief introduction about NCDOT is in charge of the roads within Orange County so 1530 they are the ultimate authority on what improvements are made because counties in North Carolina are not in the 1531 road business so they take, their recommendations are of prime importance and as the developer said they will have 1532 to do whatever NCDOT says. We work with DOT and we will take the comments that we have from tonight and 1533 impart them to NCDOT for any alternatives that there may be but NCDOT is also in the business to use taxpayer 1534 money to use the roadways to their best ability. My opinion if you want to call it that is that we will be satisfied with 1535 what NCDOT suggest as improvements for the project. 1536 1537 Kim Piracci: I just want to say that it seems to me that the traffic that's being talked about, even if it could be 1538 arranged in such a way that the traffic only comes and goes from 40 to Old 86 and never hits Davis it just seems like 1539 an enormous amount of traffic even just for Old 86. Even though I understand there'll be road expansion and 1540 whatnot so I just, I feel like the scope of the project is just too big for this space in Orange County. Maybe smaller 1541 warehouses or two instead of three. I don't know but in any case it just seems like too much. To me it seems all 1542 that's too much. 1543 1544 Hunter Spitzer: Do you have an expected return date from NCDOT on those comments?An anticipated time? 1545 1546 Michael Harvey: Hunter, let me jump in and Mr. Birch may be able to also provide some detail. I don't know if it's fair 1547 to say if we have any expectation from DOT. They obviously took a prolonged period of time to get us the comment 1548 they got us on Friday and we can obviously impress to Mr. Edwards who is our district engineer the need for 1549 expediency but I can't and will not tell you that I can guarantee that within two weeks we'll have an answer. I can't 1550 guarantee that within two weeks we'll have an answer. But I think it's reasonable for us to try if the Board sees fit to 1551 adjourn to at date and time certain in two weeks. We'll do the best we can to address this concern as best we can 1552 and I know so will the applicant but I do think it's also important for me to make clear one think to the Board. It's been 1553 sort of danced around but I think it's important to say it. One of the, this same issue came up with Settler's Point, the 1554 Department of Transportation is not satisfied with the current condition of service road which parallels (Interstate)40 1555 and they had requested or indicated that in order for Settler's Point to be developed they had to have secondary