Browse
Search
080520 Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
080520 Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 1:32:23 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 1:20:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/5/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 080520 Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> 1223 Melissa Poole: So, back to, I want to jump back to just to a moment to David, when he talking about particularly the <br /> 1224 residents most closely situated towards the lines, I mean I guess my question is how can you guarantee this will not <br /> 1225 disrupt their life if you are running multiple shifts. That's 24 hours, could be 7 days a week 24 hours and you don't <br /> 1226 know what kind of businesses are going in there. <br /> 1227 <br /> 1228 Michael Birch: Right but they are indoor activity in these buildings. In terms of like the primary use is inside, again <br /> 1229 building setbacks, vegetative buffers around the perimeter, and I mentioned earlier, those distances between just our <br /> 1230 property line in some of the closer structure to our west from the larger parcel over 1100 feet. To our south from that <br /> 1231 larger parcel over 800/900 feet so I think we are well buffered on the subject property but also a lot of the lots that <br /> 1232 surround us are deep lots with the houses situated far from the common boundary line. <br /> 1233 <br /> 1234 David Blankfard: Can you have the traffic engineer explain what is going on at Davis Drive and Old 86. Specifically, <br /> 1235 what the current traffic is and then when this is functioning what happens what will the new traffic pattern be. <br /> 1236 <br /> 1237 Matt Peach: Thank you, appreciate the question. Obviously, we recommended a traffic signal there at that location <br /> 1238 and I believe was touched on previously in the presentation but what we were concerned with at the intersection of <br /> 1239 Davis Road and Old NC 86, quite frankly, is sight distance. What our concern was traffic coming along Davis Road <br /> 1240 coming to a stop and being able to see in both direction down Old NC 86 for a sufficient distance to allow them to <br /> 1241 turn safely onto Old NC 86 to make sure there is a sufficient gap in traffic. We didn't feel that it was there in terms of <br /> 1242 site distance so we had recommended a traffic signal to that end in addition to helping facilitate movement to and <br /> 1243 from the site. In terms of traffic today, we had full traffic counts. Currently on Davis Road at Old NC 86 there's about <br /> 1244 170 cars along Davis Road in the morning peak hour. In the evening peak hour there is roughly 91 cars coming <br /> 1245 along Davis trying to turn onto Old NC 86. On Old NC 86 there's a 300 northbound cars approximately in the <br /> 1246 morning and this is consistent with the evening rush hour southbound is similar about 300 in the morning and <br /> 1247 evening rush hour. <br /> 1248 <br /> 1249 David Blankfard: That's current? <br /> 1250 <br /> 1251 Matt Peach: That's correct. <br /> 1252 <br /> 1253 Hunter Spitzer: I have a question for the County staff; does the Town's sewer line currently follow along Cate's <br /> 1254 Creek? Both sewer and water connections? <br /> 1255 <br /> 1256 Craig Benedict: I can answer that, yes the sewer line is known as the Cate's Creek outfall and it would roughly follow <br /> 1257 those elevation changes flowing to the north. The water doesn't have to follow the topography and it would be along <br /> 1258 the service road and there is an existing 16 inch water main on Old 86 now at Davis Road all the way into <br /> 1259 Hillsborough and there is actually an emergency interconnect all the way down Old 86 to the Orange Water and <br /> 1260 Sewer Authority facility. The Old 86 line is in operation with the Town of Hillsborough now and it would be those two <br /> 1261 areas, Old 86, service road and then some sort of loop through the project would be likely with the final engineering. <br /> 1262 <br /> 1263 Hunter Spitzer: I was thinking less about water and sewer and more along the lines of co-locating some sort of <br /> 1264 pedestrian trail but then I remembered that you have to build a bridge over 1-40, which would probably border on <br /> 1265 impossible. Maybe that should be a development .... If they are planning on redoing 40 in this area anyway which 1 <br /> 1266 think is the case. Ah, maybe we should see if the developer will build us a bridge,what do you say guys? <br /> 1267 <br /> 1268 David Blankfard: I still have a question for the traffic, what is going to be when it's build out what are the numbers <br /> 1269 going to be? <br /> 1270 <br /> 1271 Matt Peach: When we put the development in,we're looking at very little traffic coming from the south on Old NC 86. <br /> 1272 We're looking at, we had estimated that being a maximum of 37 vehicle per hour. That's particularly in the morning <br /> 1273 and it's similar for the southbound on Old NC 86, that is a maximum of, we had estimated that at 28 that's in the <br /> 1274 evening rush hour. Along Davis Road, since we are directing trucks to turn left out of this site and onto Davis for that <br /> 1275 short 1000 foot section to get to Old 86, we're seeing a little bit higher, so we're looking at staff, 62 in the morning <br /> 1276 traffic, an additional 62 and up to 200 vehicles per hour in the evening. <br /> 1277 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.