Orange County NC Website
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> 276 <br /> 277 Michael Birch: We were hoping to use Mr. Marshall's or removing the word unnecessarily from the proposed <br /> 278 language. Our concern with some of the other language that's being considered or proposed. As to structural <br /> 279 components,we don't know what the technology is going to be when this gets constructed so it's hard to talk in terms <br /> 280 of roof load,we don't necessarily know what type of alternative energy systems that we're talking about and so I think <br /> 281 what the intent of what we understood to be asked at the last meeting was that our building design was not going to <br /> 282 prohibit the building from being able to incorporate alternative energy sources in the future. With that understanding, <br /> 283 we said yes, we'll draft a condition around that. I think we're open to Mr. Marshall's language or also removing the <br /> 284 word unnecessarily from the proposed language. <br /> 285 <br /> 286 Hunter Spitzer: I see, I would like you to necessarily prepare for current technology existing solar panels. I'm going <br /> 287 to leave it at that. I would like for you to prepare for existing technology. I think existing technology is effective and <br /> 288 valuable and I think preparing for that allows you to adapt further down the road as well. I would like necessarily <br /> 289 prepare. I have a secondary question, some of the comments that you've calculated that 40 EV stations would be <br /> 290 built under the proposed rule that I suggested and you can back with 2 which is fine but how did you calculate 40? <br /> 291 <br /> 292 David Blankfard: So,you're going back to number 2, Hunter? <br /> 293 <br /> 294 Hunter Spitzer: We don't have to talk about it. I really like to focus on the third point but I'm curious to know how <br /> 295 they calculated 40. <br /> 296 <br /> 297 Michael Birch: We're proposing two per building and right now the thought is for four building so we would have eight <br /> 298 EV charging stations. I'm not clear where the estimate came from but I did want to clarify that it is two per building <br /> 299 and that would result in eight under the current plan. <br /> 300 <br /> 301 David Blankfard: Back to number 3. Building design construction shall not necessarily preclude incorporation of <br /> 302 alternative energy systems such as solar panels. <br /> 303 <br /> 304 Hunter Spitzer: The phrasing I was thinking was, building design and construction shall necessarily prepare for <br /> 305 incorporation of alternative energy systems specifically solar. <br /> 306 <br /> 307 Randy Marshall: I think that sounds just fine, I'm not sure the word necessarily needs to be in there but otherwise 1 <br /> 308 think Hunter's wording is satisfactory. <br /> 309 <br /> 310 David Blankfard: Would you say building design/construction shall incorporate provisions for accepting alternative <br /> 311 energy systems such as solar panels. <br /> 312 <br /> 313 Craig Benedict: If I could suggest that the wording necessarily prepare for is voted on and then you would know that <br /> 314 the Board has consensus to include that. In most cases, its true building can be retrofit to include future solar panels <br /> 315 or other photovoltaic systems. It is just identification of a County goal and it could probably be accommodated within <br /> 316 the typical design of the building. <br /> 317 <br /> 318 Michael Birch: I understand the Board may vote on it but just going back to something in Mr. Harvey's presentation <br /> 319 about the condition language which being something that is mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the Board. <br /> 320 We are willing to propose that condition either as drafted with the removal of unnecessarily with the Mr. Marshall's <br /> 321 original proposed language. Any of those 3 options, we're not sure on the applicant team what necessarily prepare <br /> 322 means and we don't necessarily know how to proof that up in a site plan so we would ask for the Board consideration <br /> 323 of one of those 3 options; as it stand today, removal of unnecessary, or Mr. Marshall's initial proposal. <br /> 324 <br /> 325 Kim Piracci: I still keep liking Hunter's words. I've got building design and construction shall include <br /> 326 <br /> 327 Hunter Spitzer: The phrasing I would like included as a condition is building design/construction shall necessarily <br /> 328 prepare for incorporation of alternative energy systems specifically solar panels. It does seem that the applicant will <br /> 329 be unwilling to agree to the condition. I don't think I would vote on it without this. <br /> 330 <br /> 331 Kim Piracci: No, I think he is willing to agree on those words that you put forth just now. <br />