081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes

Browse Search

Approved 9/2/2020 111 AGENDA ITEM 7: CLARIFICATION OF PLANNING BOARD ACTIONS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE TOWN OF 112 HILLSBOROUGH/ORANGE COUNTY CENTRAL ORANGE COORDINATED AREA (COCA) LAND USE PLAN 113 AND TO THE ORANGE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) - To review 114 and make a recommendation to the BOCC on County-initiated amendments to the COCA and 115 FLUM in the vicinity of the southern portion of the Hillsborough Area Economic Development 116 District. To clarify the motion made at the August 5, 2020 Planning Board meeting and revote on 117 the clarified motion regarding County-initiated amendments to the COCA and FLUM in the vicinity 118 of the southern portion of the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District. This item is 119 scheduled for BOCC public hearing on September 15, 2020. 120 PRESENTER: Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor 121 122 David Blankfard: Item 7 is to clarify a vote that we took on the 5th and any comments need to be in regards to this 123 clarification. Comments pertaining to the RTLP application are going to be at a later time which is up next. Can I get 124 a new motion for Item 7? 125 126 Randy Marshall: I believe the motion would amend Orange County's zoning atlas as established in Section 1.2 of the 127 Orange County UDO and whereas the proposed rezoning consist of the 8 property owners and whereas the proposal 128 has been found to be consistent with the 2030 Orange County Comprehensive Plan and whereas the requirement of 129 Section 2.8 of the LIDO has been deemed complete and whereas the Board has found that the proposed zoning atlas 130 amendment to be reasonably necessary to promote the public health, safety and general welfare we recommend that 131 the Board of County Commissioners rezone the areas described above and depicted on the attached map. 132 133 Tom Altieri: Chair Blankfard, Tom Altieri, Orange County Comprehensive Planning Supervisor. Good Evening, if 1 134 could just say a few words about this item. I think it would be helpful and I can reference page numbers that are in 135 your packet that I think would be helpful as well. So thank you for your service to the Planning Board members. The 136 purpose of this item is to clarify the motion that was made at the August 5th Planning Board Meeting and to revote on 137 the County initiated amendments to the Land Use Plans. In your agenda packet, this item is on pages 33-38. While 138 the intent of the Boards' action was clear on August 51h , through review of the meeting recording, staff discovered 139 that the motion included reading from materials related to a subsequent agenda item. Planning staff is not 140 suggesting that the Board revisit its discussion but rather to repeat the correct motion and revote so that the minutes 141 of tonight's meeting can be crystal clear. The draft minutes are an informational item in your packet. This item is 142 discussed on pages 15 to 16, which would be the discussion that you had on this item at your August 5th meeting. 143 The Planning Director's recommendation is included in your abstract which is on page 34 and that is to approve the 144 resolution contained in attachment 1 which is right after the abstract, pages 35—37. What we need from the Board 145 this evening is to recommend to the County Commissioners approval of the resolution, which is attachment 1, 146 reflecting the proposed Land Use Plan Amendments. We need a second to that motion and then a roll call vote. 147 That concludes my introduction. 148 149 (Randy Marshall nodded head in agreement to this clarifying language) 150 151 David Blankfard asked for a second to the motion, as clarified by Mr.Altieri. Adam Beeman seconded. 152 153 ROLLCALL VOTE: 154 Melissa Poole: No 155 Randy Marshall: Yes 156 Adam Beeman: Yes 157 Susan Hunter: Yes 158 Patricia Roberts: Yes 159 Carrie Fletcher: No 160 Hunter Spitzer: No 161 Alexandra Allman: Yes 162 Kim Piracci: No 163 David Blankfard: Yes 164 MOTION PASSED 6-4