Browse
Search
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 1:33:11 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> 1225 come down Davis, Ode Turner they're going to head to that 4-way stop at New Hope. They're going look for other <br /> 1226 ways. On top of that there's a reason that they're looking at the 40 exchange here, a lot of people are skeptical of the <br /> 1227 jobs being created, I think we have a right to be skeptical, I think there's a lot of jobs would go to Mebane, Burlington, <br /> 1228 Durham. I think we've be compromising our community here for commuters and I think Orange County Planning <br /> 1229 Board should be looking out for Orange County residents, number one and that's why I'd like to echo the concerns of <br /> 1230 others and urge you to consider a plan that would limit the size and scope of this to what fits on the current acreage <br /> 1231 available for economic development access via the service road. Thank you. <br /> 1232 <br /> 1233 Justin Mitchell: My name is Justin Mitchell, I own several acres of land on Davis Road adjacent to my brother's <br /> 1234 property and I've dreamed of one day living there near my family. The appeal of that dream would certainly be gone <br /> 1235 if there were huge warehouses peeking through the woods just a few hundred feet from my property. That said, one <br /> 1236 thing that we're concerned about is the runoff that will be generated due to the massive amounts of impervious <br /> 1237 surface that would be created by the project. The excess runoff would flow down Davis Road where we had a <br /> 1238 sinkhole last year where you can see the floodplain crossing Davis Road. That's due to the currently excessive <br /> 1239 amounts of water that flows down there. I think it's important that an analysis be done to assess the impact of the <br /> 1240 impervious surface. One other quick thing that I would like to add is about noise because I think it's serious, let me <br /> 1241 just point out Orange County specifically prohibits the use of lawn equipment after 9 p.m., if that's the case how can <br /> 1242 we possibly allow diesel trucks operating overnight creating noise that is up to 26 times louder than gas powered <br /> 1243 lawn equipment. I think it's imperative that a noise impact analysis the development is approved we need to protect <br /> 1244 the hearing of our residents and prevent the potentially massive disruption to the children at the preschool and of <br /> 1245 sleep, peace and the calm of the residents in the area. That's all thank you. <br /> 1246 <br /> 1247 Nan Fulcher: My name is Nan Fulcher and I'm a resident of Cornwallis Hills that's on the north side of 1-40 but <br /> 1248 according to the traffic predictions,there is an impact going up the corridor here of NC 86 about 20%of the traffic <br /> 1249 looked like on the traffic reports. Thank you for hearing everyone out tonight, as you, members of the Planning <br /> 1250 Board consider the project and make your recommendations to the Commissioners, please consider that the <br /> 1251 rezoning proposal at hand, or any proposal for that matter, please consider it from the standpoint of whether it can <br /> 1252 withstand legal challenge. The few things in this arena to think about are that rezoning is supposed to be based on <br /> 1253 the needs of the neighborhood and community not just secure special benefits for a single property owner. How can <br /> 1254 the County assure citizens this is not the case since the rezoning was requested by the applicant rather than being <br /> 1255 initiated by the County. Second consideration is whether there are other legitimate ways in which the property owner <br /> 1256 could develop the area for economic benefit without requiring rezoning. Third is that the rezoning must still maintain <br /> 1257 a harmonious land use pattern that is the juxtapositions still need to make sense. Does shoehorning a 300,000 sq.ft. <br /> 1258 warehouse and truck driveway next to private homes make sense? Also, ask whether the zoning change is in <br /> 1259 harmony with the legitimate expectations of the neighbors who live in a residential area next to Rural Buffer and part <br /> 1260 of the NC Scenic Byway. Lastly, in rezoning,the substantial benefit for one party cannot offset the substantial harm <br /> 1261 to neighbors. Even if you believe that a warehouse complex benefits the community,via job creation, or shoring up <br /> 1262 the tax base,the rights of the adjacent landowners cannot be ignored. As one Davis Road resident said,the County <br /> 1263 only gets one chance to zone this area appropriately so please consider carefully your guidance on this issue. Thank <br /> 1264 you. <br /> 1265 <br /> 1266 Sascha Godfrey: My name is Sascha, I'm 16 years old, a student at Orange High and I grew up in New Hope <br /> 1267 Springs,a neighborhood off Davis Road. I first want to thank the Planning Board for allowing us to speak and <br /> 1268 secondly, I want to plead the Planning Board to really pay attention especially given that we have listened to 2 hours <br /> 1269 for our 3 minutes of time to bottle together all of our concerns. With my 3 minutes, I could speak about the for my <br /> 1270 safely as a probable collegiate runner training on Davis Road or I could speak about my concern as a new driver and <br /> 1271 for the safety of my younger sister who will be driving soon on a road with an influx of trucks at the upper end given <br /> 1272 that young drivers have a much higher rate of accidents. However, I have one main probably more practical point to <br /> 1273 make in the development presentation earlier, it was mentioned that the development will be 2.25 million sq.ft. of <br /> 1274 building area. In parentheses, it was listed initially and that the current traffic analysis that is being used for the <br /> 1275 approval of this project is based only on the 2.25 million sq.ft. In the News of Orange article posted today, Michael <br /> 1276 Harvey mentioned that this space could occupy up to 4 million sq.ft. The applicant refused to comment. So what is <br /> 1277 actually being approved here? Along with the proposed uses how can you be sure that we have control over the <br /> 1278 tenants and the size of this development once it's built? I am very concerned by the precedent this sets for rezoning <br /> 1279 a residential neighborhood into an industrial area. The developer seemed to try to slide through the idea that the <br /> 1280 closest home will be 1000 feet away, however, that will actually be walls of the warehouse 100 feet from the person's <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.