Browse
Search
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 1:33:11 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> 833 immediately beside the access point on Davis Road is only 5 trucks in the queue on this road,this resident will <br /> 834 experience 81 decibels of sustained noise,the equivalent of standing next to a lawnmower 24/7 and also loud <br /> 835 enough to cause hearing damage at 2 hours of exposure per the CDC. It doesn't seem possible that the developer <br /> 836 could possibly reduce noise to acceptable levels at the surrounding properties and the preschool. The preschool is <br /> 837 only 60 feet from where the trucks will be queuing up and their playground is 100 feet from where the trucks will be <br /> 838 queuing up on David Road. There was a similar development that was a third the size of this development and the <br /> 839 closest resident as 550 feet from the nearest loading dock. The noise impact analysis that was done still required <br /> 840 reduced traffic even at the greatly reduced numbers and distances compared to the proposed development. I'd like <br /> 841 to add that diesel trucks typically use engine breaking that create an extremely loud machine gun like noise as much <br /> 842 as 105 decibels. These noises are only regulated during the day in Orange County and stand to create massive <br /> 843 disruptions to the preschool and the residents especially on David Road. <br /> 844 <br /> 845 Myra Gwin-Summers: I am Myra Gwin-Summers,we live two doors down from the proposed property on the corner <br /> 846 of Davis Road. We've been here for about 35 years and I see that I was down to speak on property values which <br /> 847 was not what I intended to speak on but would quickly say I cannot imagine that this project would enhance anyone's <br /> 848 property values. I have a questions and comments for Mr. Birch and I don't know if he's still present but I am going to <br /> 849 show this(visual of a mailing's return address). Why did we receive a letter regarding this project that says it is from <br /> 850 the City of Raleigh Planning Department? Who paid for the postage and does the City of Raleigh Planning <br /> 851 Department know that he has represented this project to us as if it were from them? I received an answer to that <br /> 852 today, the City of Raleigh Planning Department has no connection with the project and were very interested in the <br /> 853 fact that Michael Birch is sending out letters to residents in our county using their return address. I would like to be <br /> 854 sure and highlight that Mr. Birch has misrepresented himself here and possibly used their taxpayer money for a <br /> 855 private investment project without the knowledge or consent of the City of Raleigh. It shows poor judgement at best <br /> 856 and lack of integrity. Moreover, it's deceptive and it does beg the questions what else is deceptive about this project. <br /> 857 The next thing I wanted to address to Michael Birch, I'd like from you regarding your use of the City of Raleigh <br /> 858 Planning Department on your return mail address. I wanted to speak specifically to comment that you made that can <br /> 859 be found on page 25 of the draft minutes, lines 1226 thru 1230 when Mr. Birch was questioned about the buffers and <br /> 860 the encroachment of noise and vehicle lights due to the 24 hours 7 days a week activity. He responded that a lot of <br /> 861 the lots that surround us are deep lots with the houses situated far from the common boundary line. This is <br /> 862 completely false and the as speaker just pointed out,the driveway exit onto Davis Road runs right next to the <br /> 863 Barlow's house and will run right next to the house that will be built behind us. Next, I'd like to say that I spoke to a <br /> 864 senior engineer at Summit Engineering today who clarified for me that Summit has completely withdrawn their <br /> 865 project. They withdrew because the topography did not lend itself to large buildings it was going to be cost <br /> 866 prohibitive and they thought they would not actually be able to build the buildings. My final comment would be that <br /> 867 this is being addressed as if it is on zero grade,that's not true the corner of Davis Road is a steep hill and I wanted to <br /> 868 make the Planning Board aware in case you're not aware that Davis Road is closed for over 6 months last year due <br /> 869 to a sinkhole that is due to runoff on Davis Road. Once the corner of Davis Road is turned into an impervious <br /> 870 surface, the runoff is going to be more severe and could create more problems. <br /> 871 <br /> 872 Michael Birch: I think there were two things to address, primarily about the return addresses. Let me be clear that <br /> 873 we paid, our firm paid for the postage,the City of Raleigh return address stamp was on those envelopes related to a <br /> 874 similar or prior projects that we were doing in Raleigh and was inadvertently used for the mailing for the notices for <br /> 875 this project. I will note that the letterhead,the letter the notice that was included in the envelope very clearly stated <br /> 876 that it was from Longleaf and didn't have any reference to the City of Raleigh. I apologize for the confusion that it <br /> 877 may have caused to have the return address say City of Raleigh but we did pay for the postage and I have reached <br /> 878 out to the City of Raleigh to their Planning Director to let them know. We didn't obtain any of their envelopes or <br /> 879 anything like that they have asked us in the past to put their return address on there for other mailings. The question <br /> 880 on the buffers, I want to be clear that when I was speaking to those in the last meeting we had the exhibit up showing <br /> 881 the buffers and the transition areas and again was very clear that the majority of our property does not abut parcels <br /> 882 with homes on it. The one that are nearby are deep lots but we did recognize that there is one existing home again <br /> 883 within 100 ft. of a proposed building and we did not shy away from stating that. <br /> 884 <br /> 885 Joan Kalnitsky: My name is Joan Kalnitsky, I'd like to thank the Planning Board for listening to all of us this evening. <br /> 886 1 doubt there're are too many of us who really don't believe the property in question will be developed but developing <br /> 887 it in the manner that has beneficial to the County and the Town of Hillsborough and the residents of Orange County is <br /> 888 really important.As almost immediate access to the highways and all four directions,with seemingly little impact to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.