Browse
Search
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 1:33:11 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> 777 by going up 86, 1 basically have to go Chapel Hill and back to Hillsborough and in a practical matter, people don't do <br /> 778 that. Realistically,what would happen for me is that I would be shopping at Harris Teeter on MLK instead of Weaver <br /> 779 Street or Food Lion or Hillsborough Wine. I'd be hitting The Pig on Weaver Dairy Road instead of Hillsborough <br /> 780 Barbeque; I'd be shopping at Clifton Hills or Left Bank Butchery in Saxaphaw instead of Steve's Market. I sat down <br /> 781 and figured it out and I figured out that for every$100 1 spend in Hillsborough currently, on my daily shopping, that <br /> 782 would drop to$20 and the other$80 would be spread out between Chapel Hill, Carrboro and Durham and for me Old <br /> 783 86 which is Hillsborough Road to me,would become Carrboro Road. I'm not against developing that area because <br /> 784 it's inevitable but anything that's going to cut me off from what I consider to be my town, I have a problem with and <br /> 785 it's concerning to be that we can't really get a definitive answer on what exactly is going to be developed. I don't see <br /> 786 how the traffic plan is legitimate if we don't even know what is going to be developed. I understand the averages <br /> 787 thing but there's a lot of leeway going on in there. I agree with Ms. Fletcher, on her comments on that and that's all 1 <br /> 788 have,thank you. <br /> 789 <br /> 790 Kaila Mitchell: My Kaila Mitchell I live on Jedi Way off Davis Road. I would like to speak about the impact to air <br /> 791 quality and potential health risk that RTLP poses to our neighborhood. We know that this project will significantly <br /> 792 increase the amount of big trucks, tractor-trailers on Old 86 and Davis Road. As many as 950 trucks per day. It is <br /> 793 also reasonable to thing truck will increase on other roads nearby as they attempt to use alternate routes as Old 86 <br /> 794 and Davis Road become clogged. A lot of these trucks will emit diesel exhaust that contains more than 40 toxic air <br /> 795 contaminates including cancer causing substances such as benzene, arsenic,formaldehyde. According to California <br /> 796 EPA's office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, long-term exposure to diesel exhaust poses the highest <br /> 797 cancer risk of any toxic air contaminant evaluated by their office. To the Planning Board, as you are considering this <br /> 798 project, I urge you to keep in mind some of our most vulnerable residents when we think of air quality such as <br /> 799 children,the elderly and those with chronic health conditions and think about the locations where these vulnerable <br /> 800 individuals are most likely to spend time. For distribution centers that accommodate more than 100 trucks per day or <br /> 801 more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units per day or where transport refrigeration unit exceed <br /> 802 300 hours per week the California EPA Air Resources Board recommends in their air quality and land use handbook, <br /> 803 that these distribution centers be farther than 1000 feet from sensitive locations such as residences, school, day care <br /> 804 centers, playgrounds and medical facilities. They also recommended that entry and exit points not be located near <br /> 805 these sensitive locations as well. We have a preschool, Sounds and Colors, right at the corner of Old 86 and Davis <br /> 806 Road and we have dozens of families living all around the proposed industrial park within 1000 feet many within 300 <br /> 807 feet. California EPA Air Resources Board also showed the key findings from a number of studies which included <br /> 808 reduced lung function in children associated with traffic density especially trucks within 1000 feet and that association <br /> 809 was strongest within 300 feet.Also increased asthma, hospitalizations associated when living within 650 feet of <br /> 810 heavy traffic and heavy truck volume. Exposure to diesel exhaust can also have immediate health effects, it can <br /> 811 irritate the eyes, nose,throat and lungs and it can cause cough, headaches, light-headedness and nausea. In <br /> 812 studies with volunteers, diesel exhaust particles made people with allergies more susceptible to the things they were <br /> 813 already allergic to such as dust and pollen. Exposure to diesel exhaust also causes inflammation in the lungs which <br /> 814 may aggravate respiratory symptoms and increase the frequency or intensity of asthma attacks. I have a family <br /> 815 member who lives right here on Davis within 1000 of this as well who has chronic lung disease. He already suffers <br /> 816 enough on a daily basis, I urge the Planning Board to recommend that a risk assessment and a thorough <br /> 817 environmental analysis be performed before RTLP can move forward. Thank you. <br /> 818 <br /> 819 Matt Mitchell: My name is Matt Mitchell and I'm an audio engineer living off of Davis Road less than 1000 from the <br /> 820 proposed development. I am going to talk about noise pollution and the impact on the residents and the preschool. <br /> 821 Orange County Noise Ordinances state it shall be unlawful for any person to make create permit or to continue any <br /> 822 source of a unreasonably loud and disturbing noise in Orange County and further any sound which is substantially <br /> 823 incompatible with the time and location where created and which is perceived by a person of ordinary sensibilities as <br /> 824 interrupting the normal peace and calm of the receiving land. The receiving land being all of the residential <br /> 825 properties surrounding this proposed development. Orange County does not allow noises above 60 decibels during <br /> 826 the day and 50 decibels in the evenings at the residential properties surrounding the proposed development. The <br /> 827 noise generated from a diesel truck is between 96 and 104 decibels. This is 60 times louder than the 50 decibels <br /> 828 that the evening ordinance permits. There are residences as close as 30 feet to the proposed driveway that will be <br /> 829 carrying as many as 950 trucks per day, house#1 is 30 feet away from this driveway that is being put in where these <br /> 830 diesel trucks will be queuing up. These distances are taken from the Orange County GIS and they reflect the true <br /> 831 impact to residences. Please don't be fooled into thinking that most residences are more than 1000 feet away. I'd <br /> 832 also like to add that none of these properties depicted are commercially zoned. Focusing on the resident <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.