Browse
Search
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 1:33:11 PM
Creation date
9/29/2020 1:19:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Approved 9/2/2020 <br /> 498 these models right now and blow it up bigger. The areas of concern the ramp and the residents looking at Davis <br /> 499 Road that I can blow it up for you to see. <br /> 500 <br /> 501 Kim Piracci: I don't even know if that would help me. I know in other applications, models are considered even more <br /> 502 accurate than actual measurements and I don't know if that is true in this case. What I feel like is I want to see a map <br /> 503 with arrows. This is where cars and trucks would go and this is where they would continue to go. It was mentioned <br /> 504 that there's only a certain number of sq.ft.where traffic would be affected when this development is put in. Didn't <br /> 505 DOT just put out some recent information? <br /> 506 <br /> 507 Christa Greene: It was a response to what we submitted 2 weeks ago. It was a memo saying we concur with this or <br /> 508 we want an extra turn lane, it wasn't any figures. All the figures were in the study. I can try to pull one up. <br /> 509 <br /> 510 Craig Benedict: In your PowerPoint presentation you showed one of the maps showed how much traffic in the <br /> 511 morning and how much traffic in the evening and how much total traffic. Maybe you could pull that PowerPoint back <br /> 512 up to show those are the type of site traffic volumes that are available for the project and are part of the TIA. <br /> 513 <br /> 514 Christa Greene: I pulled something up. This is showing the traffic in 2023 and this is the total traffic so it's what's out <br /> 515 there today including the site traffic. <br /> 516 <br /> 517 David Blankfard: Does anybody else have conditions they would like to impose or have questions? I have one, I <br /> 518 have a problem with the exit onto Davis Road. I would like to impose a condition that exiting cannot happen onto <br /> 519 Davis Road and that a secondary entrance onto Old 86 be a condition. Whether somehow you take a right off the <br /> 520 service road and make a U-turn down the road or find another piece of property as time comes along, if you don't <br /> 521 have that,you can still have a left turn right turn off of the service road during the early phases of this project. <br /> 522 <br /> 523 Adam Beeman: Can I ask what your reasoning is? <br /> 524 <br /> 525 David Blankfard: I think there's going to be a lot of inconvenience and traffic problems on Davis Road. I think we're <br /> 526 pushing for further and further into the Rural Buffer onto the greenway that's out there by pushing this development <br /> 527 further and further out into the County. <br /> 528 <br /> 529 Carrie Fletcher: I have a question, so I agree with you and my question,with property owners is this,you can't tell me <br /> 530 who it is that is going to be your tenants,you can't tell me what they're going to make, or what they're going to be <br /> 531 putting in these trucks. How do you know many trucks are going to be leaving the facility and when. How can you <br /> 532 tell DOT how many trucks are going to be leaving at specific times to do these studies? I agree then stay off Davis <br /> 533 Road, leave the residents to do when they have to leave to go to work and to take their kids to school and do these <br /> 534 things because I see that as a hardship for the residents out there if this project does go through. I don't see a win <br /> 535 for the residents out there, because there are so many unknowns right now. <br /> 536 <br /> 537 David Blankfard: Not to speak for the applicant but for this type of construction,there's known quantities of what the <br /> 538 services can be and averages for all this kind of work. They've got a reasonable idea of what can happen inside of <br /> 539 that warehouse based on historical data. <br /> 540 <br /> 541 Carrie Fletcher: I'm sure before they build out something as large as this they have to know statically how many <br /> 542 tenants can x number of shipments in and out under a certain amount of time every day, 365 days a year to make it <br /> 543 profitable for them. So they would have some kind of idea of what would need to come in and out of that building. 1 <br /> 544 agree, stay off Davis Road if possible. <br /> 545 <br /> 546 Adam Beeman: I don't believe staying off Davis Road is an option for this project. I personally drove down Old 86, <br /> 547 Ode Turner, Davis Road, I drove the service road, I went down and checked off everything and I understand that the <br /> 548 residents enjoy their rural setting. I personally don't see any truck drivers choosing to swing a right on Davis and go <br /> 549 through down to Orange Grove Road, that's wasting their fuel and time and they don't have it. I really believe that <br /> 550 option off Davis, 1000 ft. they already have a church there it's not like there's not business coming off of that road as <br /> 551 it is. My opinion is that Davis Road is all or nothing for this project. I'm not against using Davis Road. <br /> 552 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.