Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
ORANGE COUNTY <br />BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br />ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br />Meeting Date: August 21, 2001 <br />Action Ag®nda <br />Item No. _ ~ `Q <br />SUBJECT: Olive Branch Inn Class A Special Use Permit (SUP-A-1-01) <br />S54 Historic Sites Non-Residential/ Mixed Use <br />DEPARTMENT: Planning 8~ Inspections PUBLIC HEARING: (Y/N) NO <br />ATTACHMENT(S): INFORMATION CONTACT: <br />Findings & HPC Determination pg• 3 Craig Benedict, Director, ext. 2592 <br />Application & Supporting Documents 12 Robert Davis Planner III ext. 2580 <br />Applicant's Response to Conditions <br />Administration Resolution for Approval for Class A 2s <br />SUP 31 Tina Moon, Planner I I, ext. 2583 <br />Planning Board Resolution for Approval for Class A SUP 33 <br />Planning Board Minutes 35 TELEPHONE NUMBERS: <br />Resolution for Approval for Class A SUP <br />Environmental Assessment & Related Materials 37 <br />39 Hlllsborou h 732-8181 <br />9 <br />State Clearing House Comments s3 Chapel Hill 968-4501 <br />Review Agency Comments 55 Durham 68$-7331 <br />Request for Land Use Buffer Waiver ~ Mebane 336-227-2031 <br />Land Use Buffer Waiver Memo 61 <br />Public Hearing Minutes 63 <br />Site Plans 67 <br />PURPOSE: To make a decision on the Class A Special Use Permit to allow the Olive Branch <br />Inn to operate as a Bed 8~ Breakfast (Use S54 Historic Sites Non-Residential/Mixed Use). <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Request <br />A~nlicant: Elizabeth P. Davidson <br />Location 7015 NC 57, Little River Township <br />Current Conditions <br />ZoZo_ Wing: Rural Residential (R-1) /Little River Protected Watershed (LITTLE-PW) <br />Land Use Classification: Rural Community Node <br />Adjacent Propefir Zoning: Rural Residential (R-1) $~ Agricultural Residential (AR) <br />Acreage: 47.17 <br />(46.02 acres excluding right-of--way of NC 57) <br />Informat'on Issues at Public Hearin on Ma 29 200 <br />• The sign, if illuminated, shall use solar powered, ground lighting. <br />• Applicant has expressed concern that solar-powered sign may not provide sufficient <br />lighting. <br />• The recommended conditions at the Public Hearing specified that the applicant dedicate (in <br />fee simple) both the property lying within the right-of-way of NC 57 and the small portion on <br />