Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-c - Proposed Amendments to the Town of Hillsborough - OC Central Orange Coordinated Area (COCA) Land Use Plan and to the OC Comp Plan Future Land Use Map (FLUM)

Browse Search

Approved 9/2/2020 MEETING MINUTES EXCERPT 1 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD 2 AUGUST 19, 2020 3 SPECIAL MEETING 4 (Due to current public health concerns, this meeting was held virtually. 5 Members of the Planning Board, staff and public participated remotely) 6 7 8 Excerpt 9 AGENDA ITEM 7: CLARIFICATION OF PLANNING BOARD ACTIONS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE TOWN OF 10 HILLSBOROUGH/ORANGE COUNTY CENTRAL ORANGE COORDINATED AREA (COCA) LAND USE PLAN 11 AND TO THE ORANGE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP (FLUM) - To review 12 and make a recommendation to the BOCC on County-initiated amendments to the COCA and 13 FLUM in the vicinity of the southern portion of the Hillsborough Area Economic Development 14 District. To clarify the motion made at the August 5, 2020 Planning Board meeting and revote on 15 the clarified motion regarding County-initiated amendments to the COCA and FLUM in the vicinity 16 of the southern portion of the Hillsborough Area Economic Development District. This item is 17 scheduled for BOCC public hearing on September 15, 2020. 18 PRESENTER: Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning Supervisor 19 20 David Blankfard: Item 7 is to clarify a vote that we took on the 5th and any comments need to be in regards to this 21 clarification. Comments pertaining to the RTLP application are going to be at a later time which is up next. Can I get 22 a new motion for Item 7? 23 24 Randy Marshall: I believe the motion would amend Orange County’s zoning atlas as established in Section 1.2 of the 25 Orange County UDO and whereas the proposed rezoning consist of the 8 property owners and whereas the proposal 26 has been found to be consistent with the 2030 Orange County Comprehensive Plan and whereas the requirement of 27 Section 2.8 of the UDO has been deemed complete and whereas the Board has found that the proposed zoning atlas 28 amendment to be reasonably necessary to promote the public health, safety and general welfare we recommend that 29 the Board of County Commissioners rezone the areas described above and depicted on the attached map. 30 31 Tom Altieri: Chair Blankfard, Tom Altieri, Orange County Comprehensive Planning Supervisor. Good Evening, if I 32 could just say a few words about this item. I think it would be helpful and I can reference page numbers that are in 33 your packet that I think would be helpful as well. So thank you for your service to the Planning Board members. The 34 purpose of this item is to clarify the motion that was made at the August 5th Planning Board Meeting and to revote on 35 the County initiated amendments to the Land Use Plans. In your agenda packet, this item is on pages 33-38. While 36 the intent of the Boards’ action was clear on August 5th , through review of the meeting recording, staff discovered 37 that the motion included reading from materials related to a subsequent agenda item. Planning staff is not 38 suggesting that the Board revisit its discussion but rather to repeat the correct motion and revote so that the minutes 39 of tonight’s meeting can be crystal clear. The draft minutes are an informational item in your packet. This item is 40 discussed on pages 15 to 16, which would be the discussion that you had on this item at your August 5th meeting. 41 The Planning Director’s recommendation is included in your abstract which is on page 34 and that is to approve the 42 resolution contained in attachment 1 which is right after the abstract, pages 35 – 37. What we need from the Board 43 this evening is to recommend to the County Commissioners approval of the resolution, which is attachment 1, 44 reflecting the proposed Land Use Plan Amendments. We need a second to that motion and then a roll call vote. 45 That concludes my introduction. 46 47 (Randy Marshall nodded head in agreement to this clarifying language) 48 49 David Blankfard asked for a second to the motion, as clarified by Mr. Altieri. Adam Beeman seconded. 50 51 ROLLCALL VOTE: 52 Melissa Poole: No 53 Randy Marshall: Yes 54 Adam Beeman: Yes 55 20