Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
DRAFT 13 <br /> 221 Michael Harvey: Yes, as I alluded, if the rezoning is approved then development of the individual parcels would have <br /> 222 to be compliant with the County Unified Development Ordinance but they would be developed and could be <br /> 223 developed independently from one another consistent with applicable standards including the Table of Permitted <br /> 224 Land Uses contained in Section 5.2. <br /> 225 <br /> 226 Perdita Holtz: Franklin Garland has put his hand up for a second time; it will be up to the Board whether you want to <br /> 227 allow additional comments from Mr. Garland. <br /> 228 <br /> 229 David Blankfard: I don't think we need to hear anything else from Mr. Garland on this agenda item. <br /> 230 <br /> 231 Gerald Scarlett: I'm Gerald Scarlett again from West Scarlett Mountain Road. I just have a quick question. I think 1 <br /> 232 know the answer but I want to make sure. Item 9 on the agenda, the only thing that is doing is reverting the zoning <br /> 233 for the property on the east side of Old 86 back to its previous zoning before the development for Settler's Point, is <br /> 234 that correct? <br /> 235 <br /> 236 Michael Harvey: You are correct sir. <br /> 237 <br /> 238 Gerald Scarlett: Thank you. <br /> 239 <br /> 240 Randy Marshall: Ready to make a motion if that's the desire of the Planning Board. <br /> 241 <br /> 242 David Blankfard: Yes <br /> 243 <br /> 244 MOTION by Randy Marshall this would be an ordinance amending the Orange County Zoning Atlas as established in <br /> 245 Section 1.2 of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance and whereas the proposed rezoning consists of <br /> 246 the eight property owners and whereas the proposal has been found to be consistent with the 2030 Orange County <br /> 247 Comprehensive Plan and whereas the requirement of Section 2.8 of the LIDO have been deemed complete and <br /> 248 whereas the Board has found that the proposed zoning atlas amendment to be reasonably necessary to promote the <br /> 249 public health, safety, and general welfare,we recommend that the Board of County Commissioners rezone the areas <br /> 250 described above and depicted on the attached maps. <br /> 251 <br /> 252 Michael Harvey: Chair Blankfard, this is Michael Harvey, can I ask for a clarification. Randy so your motion is that <br /> 253 you make a recommendation to approve the Statement of Consistency as contained in attachment 3 and the <br /> 254 proposed ordinance,which you have just summarized as contained in attachment 4 to the County Commissioners, is <br /> 255 that correct? <br /> 256 <br /> 257 Randy Marshall: My presumption was we had already approved the attachment 3 by our earlier vote and I was <br /> 258 recommending approval of attachment 4. <br /> 259 <br /> 260 Michael Harvey: No sir,this is a different item, so it's both items. <br /> 261 <br /> 262 Randy well then I recommend both 3 and 4. <br /> 263 <br /> 264 MOTION by Randy Marshall to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency and the ordinance amending <br /> 265 the Orange County Zoning Atlas. Seconded by Hunter Spitzer. <br /> 266 <br /> 267 ROLLCALL VOTE: <br /> 268 Carrie Fletcher: Yes <br /> 269 Adam Beeman: Yes <br /> 270 Hunter Spitzer: Yes <br /> 271 Melissa Poole: Yes <br /> 272 Randy Marshall: Yes <br /> 273 Kim Piracci: Yes <br /> 274 Susan Hunter: Yes <br /> 275 Alexandra Allman: Yes <br /> 276 David Blankfard: Yes <br />