Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)

Browse Search

563 TABLE 1.R Trip Generation Daily AM Peak Hour PMPeakHour Land LJso Typo ITE Code Amount Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Warehousing,1,000 Sq Ft 150 930 3,204 1.602 1,502 270 213 57 288 72 218 General Office,1.000 Sq Ft 710 50 775 388 387 110 97 13 135 23 112 Continuing Care Relirement,units 255 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hotel,Rooms 310 200 2,634 317 817 106 63 43 120 61 59 Shopping Center,1,000 Sq Ft 820 58.8 4,809 2,405 2,404 11.3 70 43 420 202 218 High-Turnavor(Sil-Dawn)Rostnuront,1,000 Sq Ft 932 S 93G 1 318 1 218 1 67 3G 31 93 so 43 High-Turnover(Sit-Dovon)Restaurant,1,000 Sq FI 932 8 1,018 1 509 5,09 1 107 57 1 50 1 148 1 80 G8 Fast-Food Restaurant with Drive-Thru Window, 1KSq FI 934 5 1 2,481 1 1,241 1,240 1 2Z8 116 112 1 164 1 85 79 SUblotal 31.4,5571 7,280 7,277 1 1,001 1 551 350 1 1,3613 1 573 795 internal captaw General Office 132 GG GG 22 20 12 31 10 21 Hotel 779 139 139 12 3 9 39 74 15 Shopping Center 818 409 409 20 11 9 175 99 76 High-Turnover(Sit-Dawn)Restaurant 108 54 S4 5 3 3 40 18 22 Hi h-Turnover(Sit-Down)Restaurant 174 87 87 11 5 6 63 29 34 Fasi-Food RertaaraW wiih Drive-Thru Window 422 211 211 21 9 12 71 31 40 Internal ap ure 1.922 9GG 96G 102 Si 51 419 211 209 Total External Trips 12,5251 6,314 6 311 899 I= 299 949 362 587 Pass-By in TolaI Pass-By Trips 10%of ad'acenl roadway Iris 72 1 36 36 1 74 1 37 37 Total Net External Trips 1t1525 61314 51311 827 1 564 1 263 1 875 1 325 550 'Internal Capture calculated using NCHRP 684-AM-8%,PM-26%,17%used for Daily(average of AM and PM) 4.12 What are the assumptions in determining future traffic counts and impacts? The Triangle Regional Model takes the following assumptions into account when estimating future traffic volumes: ■ Population and employment projections to 2045 in Orange,Wake Chatham and surrounding counties with a base assumption of 100% maximum growth based on current land uses ■ All current and future federally and regionally-funded transportation projects are completed ■ All existing and committed road improvement projects are completed ■ All future transportation projects from 2025—2045 are completed ■ Any data, analysis,alternative scenarios and results are checked by multiple sources including Triangle J Council of Governments, UNC Chapel Hill, Durham-Chapel Hill-Carrboro Municipal Planning Organization and Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization. 4.13 What type of scenarios were explored regarding access to the proposed RTLP project? Throughout the design and review process,three scenarios were explored by the applicant, NCDOT, and Orange County staff, as detailed below: ■ Scenario A- Full stop-control access at Service Road/Old NC 86 The original Traffic Impact Assessment submitted called for this intersection to be stop controlled with a left turn (northbound) and a right turn (southbound) on the Service Road. There was concern from NCDOT that traffic backing up at the on-ramp to 1-40 East would cause issues with using this section, and instead,suggested that traffic be re-routed to Davis Road or configured to allow more storage on the Service Road as well as on Old NC 86 northbound. ■ Scenario B- Full stop-control access at Davis Road/Driveway D (Currently proposed) Based on NCDOT comments with criteria for developing the Service Road exit,the developer chose to change the Service Road to a right in/right out only and to push all traffic leaving the site toward 1-40 to utilize Davis Road. The proposal is for traffic to leave Driveway D with a left turn on Davis Road and then a left at the signalized junction with Old NC 86 to approach 1-40. ■ Scenario C-Signalized light at Service Road/Old NC 86 A proposal was suggested to turn the junction of the Service Road/Old NC 86 to a full signalized intersection instead of a stop-controlled intersection, but based on pushback from businesses/residences along Old NC 86,this option was not pursued. 13