Orange County NC Website
540 <br /> ii. Final location/size shall be reviewed/approved by staff as part of a <br /> site plan submitted in accordance with Section 2.5 of the UDO and <br /> the conditions contained herein. <br /> g. Lighting: <br /> i. Lighting plans shall be prepared in accordance with Section 6.11 of <br /> the UDO; <br /> ii. All lighting shall be full-cut off fixtures; <br /> iii. Lighting in parking areas shall observe a height limit of 45 ft.; <br /> iv. All lighting shall comply with maximum foot-candle limits at property <br /> lines as noted in Section 6.11.6.A of the UDO; <br /> v. Lighting within the Project shall abide by the standards detailed in <br /> Section 6.11.8 of the UDO. <br /> h. Stream Buffers: The Project shall comply with the provisions of Section <br /> 6.13 of the UDO. <br /> STAFF COMMENT: The applicant had inquired about reducing <br /> required stream/floodplain buffers to a minimum standard of 50 ft.. <br /> This was suggested as a way of allowing for a perimeter buffer of <br /> 100 ft. as requested by staff. <br /> At this time, staff has not made a determination on this request but <br /> believes it warrants discussion. <br /> Staff requests review of the item/concern with the applicant and <br /> BOCC members in order to fashion final condition language that is <br /> mutually agreeable to all parties. <br /> i. Stormwater regulations: The Project shall comply with the provisions of <br /> Section 6.14 of the LIDO. <br /> j. Erosion Control regulations. The Project shall comply with the <br /> provisions of Section 6.15 of the UDO <br /> k. Flood regulations: The Project shall comply with the provisions of <br /> Section 6.21 of the LIDO. <br /> VI. PERMITTED AND PROHIBITED LAND USES: <br /> STAFF COMMENT: There is no concern over the proposed land <br /> uses, most of which would be permitted under the County's general <br /> use zoning designation for the property (i.e. EDH-4 or EDH-5) and <br /> were permitted under the current MPD-CZ (Settlers Point). <br /> Staff has expressed reservations with respect to the format of how <br /> permitted/prohibited land uses are listed. <br />