Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)

Browse Search

DRAFT 470 556 557 David Blankfard: One thing, did you receive a letter from the planning department? 558 559 Jon Lorusso: No I did not. 560 561 Perdita Holtz: David as you can see there are 12 people with their hands up and it now 11 p.m. I don't know if there 562 wants to be any discussion among the Planning Board on how to handle the rest of the meeting, what some options 563 might be. 564 565 Hunter Spitzer: I do recall that Michael had some comments that he wanted to make pertaining to us making 566 recommendation. So I would like to hear those at the very least before we move forward. 567 568 Michael Harvey: As I indicated, your abstract had suggested that the Board, if they felt comfortable, make a 569 recommendation in time for the County Commissioner's September 1511 hearing. Obviously the applicant will also 570 need to weigh in on this. As I see it, there's a couple of different options and scenarios here. Through no fault of the 571 applicant, we got comments from the Department of Transportation on this project Friday, July 31s'and again that is 572 not anything that staff or the applicant could control. The applicant has responded to the Department of 573 Transportation and we are waiting for a response to those comments. We've heard tonight from Planning Board 574 members related to potential conditions that you all would to see vetted before you make a final decision. We have 575 obviously heard some comments from the public and there's going to be some additional comments as we continue 576 discussion. 577 578 So as I see it the Board technically has a couple of options. The Board could table any decision providing the 579 applicant with areas of specific focus that they want answers to, I've heard loud and clear and in my note the primary 580 concerns is traffic impact and more review of the DOT comments and the applicants responses and what DOT says 581 to some of the traffic concerns I've heard. So you could certainly delay any decision tit or table the item until your next 582 regular meeting, which would be September 2°d to wait for that information. Craig and I have had a texting 583 discussion about this very topic over the last hour, you could identify areas where you have less concerns or you are 584 satisfied with the conditions and the applicant's responses and identify specific conditions you'd like to see fleshed 585 out, you could adjourn this meeting to a date and time certain in a couple of weeks conceivably to revisit this 586 discussion or the Board could vote either to make a recommendation to approve or make a recommendation to deny 587 this evening. 588 589 I'm not trying to say you don't have any of those options but staff was going to recommend was that we're still waiting 590 on DOT to get us some documentation as is the applicant and hearing some of the discussion tonight, I think that 591 there is a comfort level lacking with the transportation component from staff,the applicant who is waiting on DOT and 592 you all and that might need some discussion. Whatever you all's decision is, I would like to strongly urge you to 593 identify any specific areas of concern be it traffic, be it alternative energy conditions, whatnot so that the applicant 594 and staff have a clear understanding of what we need to be working on in the interim to provide you the feedback 595 you're asking for so you can make an informed decision. If that makes sense and thank you Hunter for asking. 596 597 David Blankfard: So what does everybody have a concern with? 598 599 Adam Beeman: My biggest concern is I want to see whatever the DOT is come to them with and determine whatever 600 steps necessary to rectify, my biggest concern is coming off of the highway and right there at the highway. I am not 601 so concerned as Davis Road as much as the highway but that's all part of the study so I'd like to see what DOT's 602 response was. 603 604 Hunter Spitzer: I would like the applicant to consider removing access to Davis Road as they move forward with the 605 process cause I suspect that we will probably vote to delay at least until our Planning Board meeting and potentially 606 until we, until you end negotiations with the DOT. Conditionally, I would like a more concise proposal on electrical 607 vehicle charging. I will just put the number out there at 1 station per 100.000 square feet of space to be built. Those 608 are my largest concerns at the moment. 609