Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 09-15-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2020 3:55:41 PM
Creation date
9/10/2020 3:33:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/15/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 09-15-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-15-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Minutes 09-15-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
Minutes 09-22-2020 Continued Virtual Business Meeting from 9/15/2020
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
575
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
398 <br /> Kimley>>>Horn Jagt <br /> iii. Sheet C-2 should display the following information: <br /> 1. Proposed floor area ratio (FAR)for the Project; <br /> 2. Proposed open space; <br /> 3. Breakdown of landscape/buffer area (i.e. acreage)for the Project; <br /> 4. Proposed setbacks (internal and external); <br /> 5. Anticipated number of parking spaces, loading berths/stalls, etc.; <br /> 6. Maximum allowable building height (in general and per each <br /> individual development `pod' if there will be a difference); <br /> 7. Anticipated number of parking spaces with access to alternative <br /> energy charging stations (if proposed); <br /> 8. Number of`park and ride' spaces (if proposed). <br /> Response: Site plans updated accordingly. <br /> Comment: iv. Development of Building D appears to `cross' an existing property line. <br /> There needs to be some explanation of boundary/development areas on the master <br /> plan set providing an explanation of what will be included within individual <br /> development areas of the Project. <br /> Response: Property lines have been updated on this submittal. <br /> Comment: v. Sheet(s) C-2 and C-2.4 indicate there will be development activity <br /> occurring within an existing utility easement, specifically a power line easement. <br /> Staff requires documentation indicating either the power line/easement is being <br /> relocated or the utility provider will allow for the development of parking and <br /> structures within their easement. <br /> Response: A copy of the Duke Energy easement is included with this submittal. <br /> Comment: vi. Sheet C-6: Label and document all proposed and/or required landscape/ <br /> buffer areas for the Project including, but not limited to: <br /> 1. Perimeter buffers; <br /> 2. In-between lot/development pod landscape areas; <br /> 3. Internal landscaping (i.e. parking lot and parking lot perimeter, building, <br /> preservation of existing significant foliage, etc.); <br /> 4. Stream/floodplain buffers; <br /> 5. Major Transportation Corridor(MTC) buffers, including requested breaks <br /> consistent with Section 6.6.4 of the UDO. <br /> Response: These items have been labeled as requested. <br /> Comment: vii. Sheet C-6 needs a legend detailing what the proposed landscape/buffer <br /> areas are. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.