Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
392 <br /> Kimley>>> Horn <br /> 21. Comment: Page 6— I.B.8.iv— Number 3: Per Section 6.7.5 (C) (1) of the UDO the <br /> maximum height allowed for the Project is 60 ft. There are additional setback <br /> requirements for structures exceeding 40 ft. in height per Section <br /> 3.7 of the UDO. <br /> Staff recommends references in the narrative to a '6 story height limit' be replaced <br /> with the following: <br /> Buildings within the development shall abide by the height limitations and allowances <br /> established within Section 3.7 Economic Development Districts — Economic <br /> Development Hillsborough Research and Manufacturing (EDH-5) of the UDO. <br /> Under no circumstances may a structure exceed 60 ft. in height. <br /> NOTE: Height allowances/restrictions should be listed on the master plan set, <br /> specifically sheet(s) C.2. <br /> Response: Narrative has been modified to address the 60'limitation. <br /> 22. Comment: Page 6— I.B.8.v— Number 4: Please include specific references to the <br /> Stream Buffer regulations as contained in the UDO (i.e. Section 6.13). <br /> Further, we recommend including language within this section referencing your <br /> submittal of a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) to the Federal Emergency <br /> Management Agency (FEMA) for review, which may result in a reduction of land area <br /> encumbered by identified floodplain. This is to address potential concern(s) the <br /> submitted master plan (i.e. the overall preliminary site plan map —Sheet C-2) denotes <br /> potential development activity in areas currently identified as being within special <br /> flood hazard area, where development activity is specifically prohibited in accordance <br /> with Section 6.21 of the UDO. <br /> Response: We have modified the narrative as requested. <br /> 23. Comment: Page 7— 1.B.9.i — Number 1 Noise: Language should indicate the Project <br /> shall comply with the County's Noise Ordinance, as enforced by the Sheriff's Office, <br /> and Section 6.4.3 of the UDO. <br /> Response: We have updated this language. <br /> 24. Comment: Page 7— I.B.9.ii—Orange County Solid Waste staff members have agreed, <br /> in concept, with the language contained in Section 2-2-2 (6) of the narrative. A <br /> recommended condition of approval will be: <br /> 'All solid waste and recycling collection methods, facilities, areas, <br /> etc. shall be reviewed during formal site plan review by Orange <br /> County Solid Waste. Site specific development conditions <br />