Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
390 <br /> Kimley>>>Horn <br /> Response: The binder has been updated accordingly. <br /> 13. Comment: Page 4— I.B.4.ii— Road improvements: Add references to the Traffic Impact <br /> Analysis (TIA) contained in Exhibit H of the application. <br /> Response: TIA comments will be addressed globally upon receipt of direction from NCDOT. <br /> 14. Comment: Page 5— I.B.5 -Section 2— Land Use Program: The narrative makes a <br /> reference to 'County Planning staff' referring to the Project as the `Research Triangle <br /> Logistics Park' or RTLP. This is the name you have chosen for the Project and is not a <br /> 'staff' reference. Please revise existing language accordingly. <br /> Response: This revision has been made as requested. <br /> 15. Comment: Page 5— I.B.6.i -The narrative should be revised to include additional <br /> detail(s) on proposed development activities, namely: <br /> A description/identification of each individual development area or'pod' within the <br /> Project; <br /> This information should also be placed on the master plan set. <br /> Response: This information has been provided as requested. <br /> 16. Comment: Page 5— I.B.6.ii-iv -The narrative should be revised to include additional <br /> detail(s) on proposed development activities, namely: <br /> -Anticipated number of buildings and their size for each development area or'pod'; <br /> -An explanation on the anticipated number of parking spaces; <br /> -An explanation of loading berths/zones for each area or'pod'; <br /> This information should also be placed on the master plan set. <br /> Response: Please reference the schematic plan that shows the general location of these <br /> items. <br /> 17. Comment: Page 5— I.B.7 -Section 2-1 Land Uses: Staff is concerned the proposed list <br /> of allowable and prohibited land uses does not following existing naming or <br /> organization conventions as detailed in Section 5.2 Table of Permitted Uses of the <br /> UDO. We suggest additional review of our recommendation(s) on the listing of land <br /> uses consistent with our June 1, 2020 email as contained in Attachment 1. <br /> Response: The list of allowable land uses shall remain as previously submitted, however, <br /> further discussion may be warranted. <br />