Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
374 <br /> May 29, 2020 — MDH review comment(s) on RTLP table of permitted land <br /> use language (observations and recommendations) <br /> Language provided by Chris Bostic in email dated May 27, 2020 as part of <br /> the draft application narrative: <br /> In addition to the uses allowed within Section 5.2.3 Uses Permitted As a <br /> Matter of Right of the Orange County Unified Development Ordinance <br /> (UDO) the following shall be permitted in all of RTLP's development <br /> districts: <br /> Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.88",Hanging: <br /> a. Customary Accessory Uses to Principal land uses developed on-site 0.19",Space After: 6 pt,Add space between <br /> paragraphs of the same style <br /> a:b. Government Facilities and Office Buildings,(MDH: as an <br /> observation only,did you want to specify what type of office. For <br /> example there may be office/service uses that create more traffic <br /> than you wish to handle(i.e.from an on and off-site roadway <br /> improvement standpoint). Also,you might want to review if you <br /> could inadvertently create a concern over incompatible land uses. <br /> For example a local government social service locates within RTLP <br /> adjacent to a manufacturing land use that makes significant noise <br /> and potentially emits odors. ) <br /> &C. Government Protective Services(MDH: staff recommends this <br /> be revised to read as follows: Government Protective Services <br /> limited to Police/Sheriff Offices, Fire Stations and Emergency Service <br /> (i.e. ambulance/rescue squad)stations. This seems more consistent <br /> with what you all are looking to allow versus the wide range of what <br /> some might consider a'government protective service' land use)., <br /> Ed. Bus Passenger Shelter, <br /> d:e. Surface and structure parking as principal use (When <br /> associated with a local or regional transportation goal such <br /> as mass transit or park- and- ride), (MDH: the way this is <br /> worded RTLP would be allowing for/encouraging a park <br /> and ride scenario on-site. If that is what you are looking for <br /> then there is no problem. Based on comments from <br /> various meetings however, I was not under the impression <br /> you were interested in providing such an amenity and <br /> Potentially impacting your clientele.) <br />