Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
365 <br /> 3. Provide detail that the Project will comply with maximum <br /> permitted foot-candle limits consistent with Section 6.11.6 of <br /> the UDO (i.e. observe a light limit of 0.5 foot-candles at any <br /> adjoining residential property line and/or 1.0 foot-candles at <br /> any adjoining non-residential property line); <br /> 4. You may wish to add language to the narrative indicating all <br /> security lights shall abide by the requirements of Section <br /> 6.11.3 (J) of the UDO; <br /> 5. Add language indicating formal lighting plans shall be <br /> submitted with all site plans where outdoor lighting is <br /> proposed; <br /> 6. Add language that lighting for the project shall comply with <br /> applicable NC Department of Transportation requirements <br /> for roadway lighting. <br /> 14. Section 3-1 Internal Traffic Circulation and Parking: No initial comments <br /> other than those referenced under `General Comments'. <br /> 15. Section 3-2 TIA Improvement Summary: <br /> i. The TIA describes the Project as consisting of of "2,251,200 sq. <br /> feet of warehouse". <br /> As there will be a myriad of other development occurring within the <br /> Project (i.e. light manufacturing, warehousing, research, medical, <br /> fulfillment services, etc.) staff is concerned the TIA does not <br /> adequately anticipate/define impacts. <br /> ii. According to the TIA, the Project anticipates generating 3,648 new <br /> trips per average weekday, with 320 AM peak trips and 326 PM <br /> peak trips. The AM/PM "peaks" represent only 18% of all trips. <br /> This number seems small to staff. This, combined with the <br /> anticipated mixture of land uses summarized herein, could create <br /> issues with some of the lower-performing LOS intersections (and <br /> overall greater rates of congestion in the area). <br /> iii. There does not appear to be sufficient right-of-way to allow for the <br /> development of a dedicated right-turn lane on southbound Old NC <br /> 86. The concern for staff is that this `right-turn lane' is the <br /> designated connection to three (listed as A, B and C within the TIA) <br /> of four total driveways to be constructed (the fourth, D, will be on <br /> Davis Rd.). <br /> iv. The three "exceptions" that do not meet LOS D or better for <br /> average intersections are all predicated on a "typical" AM and PM <br /> peak time. Staff is concerned this will, actually, be the case if the <br /> majority/entirety of the development is warehousing. <br /> V. The turn movements were calculated in October of 2016. Staff is <br /> concerned how valid this data may still be. <br /> 10 <br />