Orange County NC Website
<br />4 <br /> <br />Marshal, and NC DOT. On June 30, 2020, Planning staff sent a detailed letter to the applicant <br />requesting required revisions. <br /> The Planning Board held two meetings in August related to this case. <br /> August 5, 2020 –The proposed RTLP rezoning application was presented to and reviewed by the <br />Board, but not voted on. The meeting was continued to August 19. <br /> August 19, 2020 – The Planning Board held a special meeting to continue review and <br />deliberation on the proposed RTLP rezoning application. After public comment and deliberation, <br />the Planning Board recommended approval in a 6-4 vote. <br /> The rezoning application is scheduled for public hearing at the September 15, 2020 Orange County <br />Board of Commissioners Business Meeting. In accordance with Session Law 2020-3 (Senate Bill 704), <br />Section 4.31(a), which pertains to remote meetings during declared emergencies, written comments <br />on items heard at a public hearing are accepted for 24 hours after the public hearing is closed and <br />the Board of County Commissioners shall not make a decision on public hearing items until after the <br />24-hour period for written comments has concluded. <br /> <br />2.2 Are the specific tenants, businesses, or companies associated with the proposed RTLP <br />project available? If not, why? <br />No. Information pertaining to specific tenants, businesses, or companies related to this project are not <br />available or required. Furthermore, it is unlawful for the County to require this information or make a <br />decision based on the specific tenants, businesses, or companies. <br /> <br />The applicant is obligated to identify land uses they are intending to seek approval from the County to <br />develop within the project. They are not obligated or required to provide a site-specific development <br />plan identifying the actual tenants or companies for approval. The MPD-CZ process essentially allows the <br />County to create a new zoning district with mandatory development standards and criteria governing <br />actual development activities. Through this process the County does have the ability to offer comment <br />and/or make conditions on proposed land use categories (i.e. manufacturing land uses, research land <br />uses, professional office land uses, etc.), but does not have the ability to compel applicant’s identify <br />specific clients. If there is a concern over a particular activity, the BOCC can impose conditions to <br />address. <br /> <br />2.3 If the rezoning request is approved by the Orange County Board of Commissioners, what <br />will be the next steps in the process? <br />If approved, this application will rezone the parcels to a Master Plan Development - Conditional Zoning <br />(MPD-CZ) District. A MPD-CZ is a unique zoning district with its own development conditions specific to <br />the project and the site. The applicant and the BOCC must discuss and mutually agree to development <br />conditions at the public hearing. In order to develop the project, the applicant must comply with those <br />conditions. <br /> <br />Rezoning applications, like this application for RTLP, deal with zoning and land use. Development <br />permitting is handled separately. If the RTLP rezoning is approved, the applicant will still have to apply <br />for development permits, including a site plan, stormwater management plan, building permits, etc. <br />Staff will review those applications administratively. All development plans must comply with the <br />Unified Development Ordinance. <br /> <br />2.4 What happens to the existing MPD -CZ previously approved for Settlers Point? <br />The existing Settlers Point MPD-CZ was approved by the County in January 2018. As staff understands it, <br />the original applicant was unable to move the MPD-CZ for Settlers Point forward (i.e. initiate <br />development activity) until utilities were extended. Extension of utilities, unfortunately, has been <br />delayed. The current applicant is seeking to modify what was originally approved back in 2018 and has <br />554