Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 09-15-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2020 3:28:37 PM
Creation date
9/10/2020 3:14:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/15/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
575
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D R A F T <br /> <br />David Blankfard: There is a similar part on the east side. That person’s home is quite close to the property line. I 220 <br />am just wondering is their backyard going to be your driveway and parking lot. 221 <br /> 222 <br />Michael Birch: No, there was anticipate likely having a stormwater control facility in that area and then only outside of 223 <br />that, again, we are kind of showing a 100 foot buffer on this exhibit that the parking and drive aisle would be outside 224 <br />of that, largely outside of that 100 feet. 225 <br /> 226 <br />David Blankfard: Is this going to be phased construction; are you starting with Building A and then going to Build B, 227 <br />C and then finishing up with D? 228 <br /> 229 <br />Michael Birch: Likely, it will be phased. I don’t know exactly if it’s a Building A, B, C, D but we do anticipate that it 230 <br />would be phased. The building likely off the service road to be part of that initial phase. 231 <br /> 232 <br />David Blankfard: Are they all one story, or are they going to be multiple stories or high bay? 233 <br /> 234 <br />Michael Birch: Anticipated to be one story. 235 <br /> 236 <br />David Blankfard: So, high bay? 237 <br /> 238 <br />Michael Birch: Yes. 239 <br /> 240 <br />David Blankfard: Are you going to put any photovoltaics on the roof? 241 <br /> 242 <br />Hunter Spitzer: I was going to ask how far away is the nearest Duke Energy substation? 243 <br /> 244 <br />Michael Birch: I want to make sure I heard the two questions to make sure we get the response for you. One, how 245 <br />far away are we from the closest Duke Energy substation and then two, are we planning to include any photovoltaic 246 <br />cells or panels on the roofs. Just from the developer it’s likely that some will be included. We don’t have the answer 247 <br />on what the distance is to the substation. 248 <br /> 249 <br />Hunter Spitzer: Would the developer be willing to submit to a condition requiring roofs not to install solar immediately 250 <br />but to be readily available to solar installation? If that makes sense? Designed with the intent to install solar. 251 <br /> 252 <br />Michael Birch: Yes, I think that’s something that the developer would be willing to agree to. 253 <br /> 254 <br />Hunter Spitzer: Additionally, would the developer be willing to commit to electrical vehicle charging stations in 255 <br />addition to this? 256 <br /> 257 <br />Michael Birch: Yes. 258 <br /> 259 <br />Hunter Spitzer: I know for the Settler’s Point development we had, I am be confusing this with a different Special Use 260 <br />Permit, but we had agreed to a particular number of stations per parking spaces. I am sure one of the staff can 261 <br />remember because it was based on the parking deck for the Orange County Municipal Building downtown. What 262 <br />would be acceptable ratio? 263 <br /> 264 <br />Michael Birch: My senses given the nature of this development and how different it is both from Settler’s Point and 265 <br />the project that was used as a reference point for that Settler’s Point ratio, my sense is we would not be agree on a 266 <br />ratio basis. I think we could discuss a flat number of station. 267 <br /> 268 <br />Hunter Spitzer: I see and are you intending to provide stations or availability to electrical fleet management 269 <br />particularly in the context of developing the distribution center? 270 <br /> 271 <br />Michael Birch: Sorry, just to kind of answer your question, our sense is that something like that or having that 272 <br />available will be driven by the end user, a particular end user that we don’t have in mind right now or don’t have at 273 <br />the table. So I think it would be hard for us, difficult for us to commit to providing that and then there’s the potential, 274 <br />again if it’s not a warehouse, distribution use. Kind of having those and nothing to use it so I think given that is 275 <br />464
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.