Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 09-15-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-15-20; 5-a - Zoning Atlas Amendment - Master Plan Development Conditional Zoning District (MPD-CZ) for the Research Triangle Logistics Park (RTLP)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2020 3:28:37 PM
Creation date
9/10/2020 3:14:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/15/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5-a
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
575
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 7 <br /> <br />kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000 <br /> <br /> <br />21. Comment: Page 6 – I.B.8.iv – Number 3: Per Section 6.7.5 (C) (1) of the UDO the <br />maximum height allowed for the Project is 60 ft. There are additional setback <br />requirements for structures exceeding 40 ft. in height per Section <br />3.7 of the UDO. <br />Staff recommends references in the narrative to a ‘6 story height limit’ be replaced <br />with the following: <br />Buildings within the development shall abide by the height limitations and allowances <br />established within Section 3.7 Economic Development Districts — Economic <br />Development Hillsborough Research and Manufacturing (EDH-5) of the UDO. <br />Under no circumstances may a structure exceed 60 ft. in height. <br />NOTE: Height allowances/restrictions should be listed on the master plan set, <br />specifically sheet(s) C.2. <br /> <br />Response: Narrative has been modified to address the 60’ limitation. <br /> <br />22. Comment: Page 6 – I.B.8.v – Number 4: Please include specific references to the <br />Stream Buffer regulations as contained in the UDO (i.e. Section 6.13). <br />Further, we recommend including language within this section referencing your <br />submittal of a Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA) to the Federal Emergency <br />Management Agency (FEMA) for review, which may result in a reduction of land area <br />encumbered by identified floodplain. This is to address potential concern(s) the <br />submitted master plan (i.e. the overall preliminary site plan map — Sheet C-2) denotes <br />potential development activity in areas currently identified as b eing within special <br />flood hazard area, where development activity is specifically prohibited in accordance <br />with Section 6.21 of the UDO. <br /> <br />Response: We have modified the narrative as requested. <br /> <br />23. Comment: Page 7 – I.B.9.i – Number 1 Noise: Language should indicate the Project <br />shall comply with the County's Noise Ordinance, as enforced by the Sheriff’s Office, <br />and Section 6.4.3 of the UDO. <br />Response: We have updated this language. <br /> <br />24. Comment: Page 7 – I.B.9.ii – Orange County Solid Waste staff members have agreed, <br />in concept, with the language contained in Section 2-2-2 (6) of the narrative. A <br />recommended condition of approval will be: <br />'All solid waste and recycling collection methods, facilities, areas, <br />etc. shall be reviewed during formal site plan review by Orange <br />County Solid Waste. Site specific development conditions <br />392
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.