Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Page 5 <br /> <br />kimley-horn.com 421 Fayetteville Street, Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601 919 677 2000 <br /> <br />Response: The binder has been updated accordingly. <br /> <br />13. Comment: Page 4 – I.B.4.ii – Road improvements: Add references to the Traffic Impact <br />Analysis (TIA) contained in Exhibit H of the application. <br /> <br />Response: TIA comments will be addressed globally upon receipt of direction from NCDOT. <br /> <br />14. Comment: Page 5 – I.B.5 - Section 2 — Land Use Program: The narrative makes a <br />reference to 'County Planning staff’ referring to the Project as the ‘Research Triangle <br />Logistics Park' or RTLP. This is the name you have chosen for the Project and is not a <br />‘staff' reference. Please revise existing language accordingly. <br />Response: This revision has been made as requested. <br /> <br />15. Comment: Page 5 – I.B.6.i - The narrative should be revised to include additional <br />detail(s) on proposed development activities, namely: <br />A description/identification of each individual development area or ‘pod’ within the <br />Project; <br />This information should also be placed on the master plan set. <br /> <br />Response: This information has been provided as requested. <br /> <br />16. Comment: Page 5 – I.B.6.ii-iv - The narrative should be revised to include additional <br />detail(s) on proposed development activities, namely: <br />-Anticipated number of buildings and their size for each development area or 'pod’; <br />-An explanation on the anticipated number of parking spaces; <br />-An explanation of loading berths/zones for each area or ‘pod’; <br />This information should also be placed on the master plan set. <br /> <br />Response: Please reference the schematic plan that shows the general location of these <br />items. <br /> <br />17. Comment: Page 5 – I.B.7 - Section 2-1 Land Uses: Staff is concerned the proposed list <br />of allowable and prohibited land uses does not following existing naming or <br />organization conventions as detailed in Section 5.2 Table of Permitted Uses of the <br />UDO. We suggest additional review of our recommendation(s) on the listing of land <br />uses consistent with our June 1, 2020 email as contained in Attachment 1. <br /> <br />Response: The list of allowable land uses shall remain as previously submitted , however, <br />further discussion may be warranted. <br /> <br />390