Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-21-2001-8b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2001
>
Agenda - 08-21-2001
>
Agenda - 08-21-2001-8b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:48:22 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:33:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/21/2001
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 08-21-2001
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14 <br />a. Impervious Structure and Detention Pond Requirements <br />1) Residential Development <br />2) Non-Residential Development <br />4 <br />5 Robert Davis made this presentation. <br />6 <br />7 BACKGROUND: <br />8 Both the Stonnwater Management Program for Lands within the Neuse River Basin and the Orange County <br />9 Zoning Ordinance have requirements for Best Management Practices. The BMP's in both cases are intended to <br />10 reduce the negative environmental effects of development on the streams and water supplies within North <br />11 Carolina. The slight variation in the definition of the term Best Management Practice in the two ordinances is <br />12 highlighted in italics below: <br />13 <br />14 Zonin Ordinance Definition: A structural or non-structural management-based practice used singularly or <br />15 in combination to reduce non-point source pollution to receiving waters in order to achieve water quality <br />lb protection goals. (See also, Detention Pond and Engineered Stormwater Controls) (Unless otherwise <br />17 specified, "BMP", when used in this Ordinance, refers to structural BMP's.) <br />18 <br />19 Neuse River Basin Definition: A structural or non-structural management-based practice used singularly or <br />20 in combination to reduce non-point source inputs to receiving waters in order to achieve water quality <br />21 protection goals. <br />22 <br />23 The Neuse River Basin regulations specify that BMP's shall be implemented to reduce negative inputs (i.e. <br />24 nitrogen) into the streams. The zoning ordinance specifies that BMP's cannot be used to satisfy watershed <br />25 requirements for most residential development and most non-residential development. The zoning ordinance <br />26 language is intended to prohibit use of manmade structures like detention ponds, swales, engineered stormwater <br />27 devices, etc. to raise impervious surface ratios as opposed to natural BMP's like buffers, trees and grass. <br />28 <br />29 While there is no conflict that the purpose of both ordinances is to protect streams and watersheds, the language <br />30 in the zoning ordinance needs to be clarified. The intent of the restrictive language in the watershed portion of <br />31 the zoning ordinance is to eliminate the possibility that a development proposal in certain watersheds could <br />32 increase the impervious surface maximums of the ordinance by using the BMP approach. One reason that the <br />33 County did not allow watershed BMF's was the State rule that required local governments perform annual <br />34 inspections and make annual reports to the State on all BMP's. This was an unfunded mandate passed to the <br />35 local jurisdictions with the potential for State implemented fines on the County for noncompliance by the <br />36 property owners. Therefore, many jurisdictions, Orange County included, decided to not allow BMP's for <br />37 increasing impervious surface ratios. <br />38 <br />39 This amendment is to add language in the watershed section of the zoning ordinance that clarifies the apparent <br />40 conflict with the Neuse River Basin regulations and, at the same time, maintains the current prohibition against <br />41 BMP's being used to increase impervious surface ratios.' <br />4z <br />43 Development Process. Schedule. and Action <br />44 • First Action: Public Hearing held on May 29, 2001; item referred to Planning Board. <br />45 Second Action: Planning Board to take action within two regularly scheduled Planning Board meetings, or <br />46 extension thereof; or if the Planning Board fails to act within the specified time period, application <br />47 forwarded to 8000 with Planning Board minutes and Planning Staff recommendations and conditions. <br />48 Third Action: BOCC to make decision. <br />49 <br />50 FINANCIAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact is associated with this action. <br />51 <br />52 RECOMMENDATTON(S): Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the attached <br />53 ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.