Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 3 - Discussion Regarding the Membership Composition of the Planned Committee to Examine the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
>
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 3 - Discussion Regarding the Membership Composition of the Planned Committee to Examine the Election Method for Members of the Orange County Board of Commissioners
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2020 1:14:42 PM
Creation date
9/4/2020 1:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/10/2020
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 <br />The Board then pursued a series of meetings over the next thirteen months, including: <br />public hearings; <br />Board discussions on possible draft district maps/plans for either a five or seven- <br />member <br />Board; and <br />decisions on specific map/plan issues. <br />The public hearings and discussions led to the development of a map/plan (for a seven- <br />member board that met all statutory requirements. The County Attorney prepared a draft <br />resolution calling for a November 2006 referendum and the Board approved that <br />resolution and the election plan/map at its June 27, 2006 regular meeting in preparation <br />for a voter referendum as required by the North Carolina General Statutes. <br />In the November 2006 referendum, the voters subsequently approved the election <br />plan/map with more than two-thirds of voters supporting the initiative. The election <br />plan/map was implemented with the May 2008 primary election and all Board members <br />since that time have qualified and been elected under the plan. <br />The election plan/map approved in 2006 established a district/at large system for electing <br />seven members of the Board of Commissioners, and includes two nominating districts. <br />Three seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four-year terms, by individuals <br />residing in District 1 and nominated by the voters in District 1 during the primary <br />election. <br />These district-nominated candidates are then elected by all the voters in the <br />entire County during the general election. <br />Two seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four-year terms, by individuals <br />residing in District 2 and nominated by the voters in District 2 during the primary <br />election. These district-nominated candidates are then elected by all the voters in <br />the entire County during the general election. <br />The other two other seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four-year terms, <br />by individuals residing anywhere in the County and nominated by all voters in the <br />County during the primary election. These "at large" candidates are then elected <br />by all the voters in the entire County during the general election. <br />In summary, five district seats on the Board are filled based on district residency and <br />district nomination during the primary election, followed by countywide election in the <br />general election. <br />The two at large seats are filled based on countywide nomination and countywide <br />election. <br />2011 - Review of District Elections Map Based on 2010 Census <br />Final numbers for the 2010 Census were published in 2011 providing new population <br />numbers for Orange County as a whole as well as for the two current electoral districts. <br />North Carolina General Statute 153A-22 states, "If a county is divided into electoral <br />districts for the purpose of nominating or electing persons to the board of commissioners, <br />the board of commissioners may find as a fact whether there is substantial inequality of <br />population among the districts." <br />Population growth or decline in districts can lead to significant deviations in the numbers <br />of residents between districts, thereby compromising the integrity of the districts and the <br />election plan as a whole. Staff's review of the 2010 Census population totals in relation to <br />the election plan/map and district boundaries showed very minimal changes in the <br />population ratios for the districts. Staff prepared an agenda item for the Board, and, at its <br />5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.