Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 1 - Additional Discussion on Potential Regulation of the Discharge of Firearms in Areas of the County with High Residential Unit Density
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
>
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 1 - Additional Discussion on Potential Regulation of the Discharge of Firearms in Areas of the County with High Residential Unit Density
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2020 1:06:49 PM
Creation date
9/4/2020 1:26:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/10/2020
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />would only apply to shooting ranges constructed or developed without appropriate approvals <br />since the County’s firearms discharge ordinance was adopted in 2016. <br /> <br />To show where such regulations could be imposed, Planning staff developed multiple County <br />maps showing areas of the County with various residential housing densities. These maps are <br />for illustrative purposes only and show where an ordinance of this type could be applicable. <br />According to Planning staff, Map 1 in Attachment A shows a suburban equivalent density – that <br />being one or more dwelling units per 1/3 acre. It is clear from the map that there are very few <br />areas with this residential density within Orange County’s jurisdiction. Map 2 shows a density of <br />one or more dwelling units per one acre. Map 3 shows an intermediate rural density of one or <br />more dwelling units per 1.25 acres. Map 4 shows a substantially less dense arrangement of one <br />or more dwelling units per 2 acres. According to the Planning staff, Map 5 shows all <br />subdivisions within the County’s jurisdiction that contain 10 lots or more, including such <br />subdivisions within town ETJ areas. Map 6 is an aerial map showing lots and buildings within <br />the Churton Grove subdivision, a subdivision having lots of approximately ½ acre on average. <br />Map 7 is an aerial map showing lots and buildings within the Hunt’s Preserve subdivision, a <br />subdivision having lots of approximately 2.4 acres on average with a range of 1.2 to 5.8 acres. <br /> <br />Regulated areas could be established within designated subdivisions with enforcement focused <br />on discharges occurring within the subdivision. As is apparent from the map, focusing only on <br />areas with suburban like density would create small islands of enforcement near municipal <br />boundaries. <br /> <br />Durham County previously had a similar ordinance in which the ordinance only applied to <br />discharge of firearms within 600 feet of a residence within one of many designated high density <br />areas. Durham also had a permit process for shooting ranges that existed in the regulated areas <br />prior to the adoption of the ordinance (Attachment C). According to the Durham County <br />Attorney, enforcement proved exceptionally difficult and in December 2018 Durham County <br />amended its ordinance to remove the references to high density areas and now restricts <br />firearms discharge throughout the county if it occurs within 900 feet of the property lines of <br />properties containing houses, schools, and churches (Attachment D). This level of restriction <br />may not be appropriate for Orange County, which is substantially more rural than Durham. <br /> <br />The County Attorney consulted the Orange County Sheriff’s Office on this issue and, as in prior <br />discussions of this topic, and as Durham County experienced with a similar ordinance, the <br />Sheriff’s office indicates enforcement of an ordinance similar to Durham’s prior or current <br />ordinance would be difficult due to the nature of the regulated activities, that being generally <br />short in duration and, unless visually observed by a deputy, difficult to precisely locate. <br /> <br />Pursuant to North Carolina law any regulation such as that discussed would apply to all <br />discharges of firearms in Orange County’s jurisdiction including discharges on shooting ranges <br />constructed after any amendment adopted by the Board and on existing ranges as noted <br />above. Any ordinance adopted would not apply to the discharge of firearms for lawful hunting <br />activities, discharges occurring in the defense of person or property, or discharges pursuant to <br />the lawful directions of law enforcement officers. <br /> <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with this discussion. <br /> <br />SOCIAL JUSTICE IMPACT: There is no Orange County Social Justice Goal impact associated <br />with this discussion. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.