Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
17 4 <br /> Dave Scott said the program is set to begin in August. He said students in <br /> grades 6-12 currently have devices, which they will keep for now, and turn in at the end <br /> of the summer. He said 2-5 graders also use chrome books, but there is not a one to <br /> one program for elementary school; however, during Covid-19 these younger grades <br /> have been provided devices, if needed. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if CHCCS would include information about <br /> anything alarming or intriguing that has been detected on devices, when it sends its <br /> report to the Orange County Board of Commissioners. <br /> Interim CHCCS Superintendent Abele said there are red flags that the word <br /> search software finds. He said suicide is one of the words that CHCCS would definitely <br /> follow up on. <br /> Chair Rich asked if there is a plan in place to reallocate the monies for the 4 <br /> years, should the state provide funding for this technology. <br /> Paul Laughton said staff can adjust the CIP if the funds are received early <br /> enough; and otherwise, staff would re-purpose those funds, keep it in the technology line <br /> item, and come back to the Orange County Board of Commissioners to approve any <br /> reallocations. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner Price, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Marcoplos to adopt the resolution approving the lease agreement and authorize the Chair <br /> to sign the resolution regarding the agreement between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City <br /> Schools and Trinity3 Technology. <br /> VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> b. Discussion Regarding Election Method for Members of the Oranqe County <br /> Board of Commissioners <br /> The Board considered discussing the election method for members of the Orange <br /> County Board of Commissioners. <br /> John Roberts reviewed the information below: <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> At the Board's April 7, 2020 Business meeting, a petition was voiced that the <br /> Board discuss and potentially change a portion of the process under which some or all <br /> Board members are elected. A summary of historical information, along with some <br /> current applicable information, is provided below as a basis for Board discussion on this <br /> topic. <br /> HISTORY <br /> 2005-2008 <br /> At the Board of Commissioners' January 24, 2005 regular (now Business) meeting, <br /> representatives of a group of Orange County residents addressed the Board and <br /> submitted a 1,200-signature petition to the Board regarding the method by which the <br /> members of the Board of Commissioners were elected in Orange County. The <br /> representatives requested that the Board review the then current method of election for <br /> the members of the Board, which entailed all five members of the Board being nominated <br /> and elected to staggered four-year terms on an at-large basis. <br /> At the Board's direction, the County Manager and County staff reviewed the issue and <br /> the petition submitted and provided a report to the Board at the May 5, 2005 work <br /> session. The report provided an initial framework of information upon which the Board of <br /> Commissioners could deliberate and determine as appropriate any further steps in <br /> evaluating the issue and responding to the request and petition submitted. <br />