Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 2 - Follow-up Discussion on County Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Years 2 through 5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
>
Agenda - 09-10-20; Item 2 - Follow-up Discussion on County Capital Investment Plan (CIP) Years 2 through 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/4/2020 1:31:12 PM
Creation date
9/4/2020 1:11:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/10/2020
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
Item 2
Document Relationships
Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-10-20 Virtual Work Session
Minutes 09-10-2020 Virtual Work Session
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee said he feels the same about all of these entities: he does <br /> 2 not get a lot individually, but the County does receive benefits. He said the cost of the <br /> 3 memberships is very small, and he sees greater benefit in remaining a member of each <br /> 4 entity. <br /> 5 Commissioner McKee said he will oppose defunding each of these <br /> 6 memberships. <br /> 7 Commissioner Dorosin said these organizations provide different levels of <br /> 8 support to the County. He said he sees limited benefit from NACo, and North Carolina <br /> 9 Association of County Commissioners (NCACC); but the Triangle J Council of <br /> 10 Governments (TJCOG) and the School of Government (SOG) are closer to the County's <br /> 11 regions and needs, and provide valuable resources. He said he would like to know <br /> 12 more about what is actually received for each of these fees, and any savings are good <br /> 13 savings, if the expense is not providing value. <br /> 14 Commissioner Greene said she knows nothing about NACo. <br /> 15 Chair Rich said she is the Board's representative to NACo this year, and in the <br /> 16 past she was on the telecommunications committee, and became frustrated with the <br /> 17 organization. She said NACo does provide some value if one attends NACo <br /> 18 conferences for specific areas. <br /> 19 Commissioner Price said one gets out of NACo what one puts it into it. She has <br /> 20 been involved in different committees, and NACo is basically a lobbying organization. <br /> 21 She said one area of great impact was in housing funding, as well as arts and culture <br /> 22 being recognized as an economic driver. She said NCACC works in conjunction with <br /> 23 NACo and SOG, and the trainings offered by these entities are very valuable. <br /> 24 Bonnie Hammersley said from a staff viewpoint, NACo is directed toward elected <br /> 25 officials. She said NACo and NCACC are lobbying organizations, one on the national <br /> 26 level and one on the state level. <br /> 27 Commissioner Greene said the amount is under $3000/year, and Commissioner <br /> 28 Price's comments are helpful. She said many Commissioners are more conservative, <br /> 29 and the Orange County BOCC is typically not, and being heard is important. <br /> 30 Commissioner McKee agreed with Commissioner Greene, and said it is <br /> 31 important to continue to have a voice. <br /> 32 Commissioner Marcoplos said he does not think the BOCC has an impact on the <br /> 33 rural/urban divide by being a part of NACo, but perhaps it does by being a part of <br /> 34 NCACC. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner <br /> 37 Dorosin to defund NACo. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 VOTE: Ayes, 2 (Commissioner Marcoplos and Commissioner Dorosin); Nays, 5 <br /> 40 (Commissioner Price, Chair Rich, Commissioner Greene, Commissioner Bedford, <br /> 41 Commissioner McKee) <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Amendment 006/007 <br /> 44 Commissioner Marcoplos said he would like to know more about what benefits <br /> 45 are received from the SOG, and if it is useful. <br /> 46 Commissioner Dorosin asked if staff could identify what the $17,000+ dues are <br /> 47 for. <br /> 48 Bonnie Hammersley said she believes it is considered a contribution, as opposed <br /> 49 to a membership, and from a staff level, it is very valuable to local governments. <br /> 50 Commissioner Dorosin said asked if there is a process to determine the amount <br /> 51 of contribution that is made to the SOG. He said making a contribution does not <br /> 52 translate into reduced fees for conferences, and the SOG's mission is to serve the state <br /> 53 of North Carolina, and he thinks the school would offer help to anyone who calls, <br /> 54 regardless of having made a contribution or not. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.