Orange County NC Website
14 <br /> 1 staff has regular IT updates and maintenance to keep up to date. He said the motion <br /> 2 would reduce IT greatly. <br /> 3 Commissioner McKee said the Board cannot continue to strip the IT budget, and <br /> 4 the Board is entering down a rabbit hole here. <br /> 5 Commissioner Greene said she shares the same concern, and withdrew her <br /> 6 second. <br /> 7 Commissioner Price said she cannot support it. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 No second <br /> 10 MOTION FAILS <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Commissioner Price asked if the Board is locked into $26 million. <br /> 13 Commissioner Dorosin said the Board just voted to approve it. <br /> 14 Bonnie Hammersley said the amount is up to the board. <br /> 15 <br /> 16 A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner <br /> 17 Marcoplos to table this item until second meeting in September so this topic can be fully <br /> 18 researched. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Chair Rich said the Board has passed many of these things. <br /> 21 Commissioner McKee said the Board has passed them, but not funded them. <br /> 22 Commissioner Dorosin said the Board has already voted affirmatively, and <br /> 23 cannot undo that vote. He said the Board can vote against it at the June 16 meeting <br /> 24 during the final budget vote. <br /> 25 Commissioner McKee said the Board needs to have a much less convoluted <br /> 26 process and discussion. He said two different scenarios have been proposed, and the <br /> 27 Board is trying to mix and match to find a way to fund these approved changes. He said <br /> 28 a Commissioner who voted favorable to move the projects up could make a motion to <br /> 29 rescind that vote, thus allowing the BOCC to table to discussion. <br /> 30 Commissioner Dorosin said the BOCC would need to revote in order to table the <br /> 31 discussion with the delays on year one. He said he would like the Board to review the <br /> 32 slide with his proposed cuts, and have the Board vote on each one, up or down. <br /> 33 Commissioner McKee said Commissioner Dorosin is pushing an item that does <br /> 34 not have a plan to bring it to fruition. <br /> 35 Commissioner Marcoplos said he would like to support the Durham Tech <br /> 36 expansion, but he wants to understand the implications of each of these cost offsets, <br /> 37 and how they will impact the community. He said he would like to review each proposed <br /> 38 cut, so that he can be fully informed on the rationale for his vote. He said this will likely <br /> 39 take a few work sessions. <br /> 40 Chair Rich said the Board already passed pushing this forward, as well as the <br /> 41 first year of funding. <br /> 42 Commissioner Greene said the question is if the Board has to commit the money <br /> 43 now, or can it do so after the budget is approved. <br /> 44 Travis Myren said the Board can approve the appropriation of year one, and <br /> 45 accept the rest of the plan, which can always be amended in September. <br /> 46 Chair Rich said the Board has approved year one to move up, etc. <br /> 47 Bonnie Hammersley said the Board has also approved $14 million and $11 <br /> 48 million in years two and three. She said if the Board is going to offset these amounts, it <br /> 49 needs to do before the County goes out for borrowing, otherwise the rating agencies will <br /> 50 see this negatively. She said rating agencies will not be contacted until spring 2021, so <br /> 51 the Board could make changes in the fall. She said without these amounts being offset, <br /> 52 the rating agencies will expect to see a tax increase in future years to cover the costs. <br /> 53 Commissioner Greene suggested holding some work sessions before June 301" <br /> 54 the final date by which the Board must have an approved budget. <br />