Orange County NC Website
14 <br /> 1 the FY2020-21 County Fee Schedule, consistent with the parameters outlined in the Board's <br /> 2 "Resolution of Intent to Adopt the FY2020-21 Orange County Budget". <br /> 3 <br /> 4 VOTE: UNANIMOUS <br /> 5 <br /> 6 b. Approval of the Orange County Capital Investment Plan Projects of$35,003,347 <br /> 7 for FY2020-21 <br /> 8 <br /> 9 The Board considered voting to approve the Orange County Capital Investment Plan <br /> 10 Projects of$35,003,347 for FY2020-21. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 BACKGROUND: For over 20 years, the County has produced a Capital Investment Plan (CIP) <br /> 13 that establishes a budget planning guide related to capital needs for the County as well as <br /> 14 Schools. The current CIP consists of a 5-year plan that is evaluated annually to include year-to <br /> 15 year changes in priorities, needs, and available resources. Approval of the CIP commits the <br /> 16 County to the first year funding only of the capital projects; all other years are used as a <br /> 17 planning tool and serves as a financial plan. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 Capital Investment Plan — Overview <br /> 20 The FY2020-21 (Year 1) CIP includes County Projects, School Projects, and Proprietary <br /> 21 Projects. The School Projects include Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools, Orange County <br /> 22 Schools, and Durham Technical Community College — Orange County Campus projects. The <br /> 23 Proprietary Projects include Water and Sewer, Solid Waste Enterprise Fund, and Sportsplex <br /> 24 projects. <br /> 25 <br /> 26 At the June 9, 2020 Budget Work Session, the Board of County Commissioners approved the <br /> 27 Intent to Adopt the FY 2020-21 (Year 1) funding of the Capital Investment Plan. Final decisions <br /> 28 on a Five-Year CIP will be considered by the Board in September 2020. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Commissioner Bedford said, out of an abundance of caution to protect her CPA license, <br /> 31 she expects to vote no on years 2 and 3 in September, due to wanting to avoid any possible <br /> 32 impropriety and conflict with the LGC. <br /> 33 Commissioner Dorosin asked if years 2 and 3 were already approved at last week's <br /> 34 meeting. <br /> 35 Travis Myren said the Board is just approving year one tonight for the planning, and the <br /> 36 rest of the plan will be reviewed in September. <br /> 37 Commissioner Dorosin said that was not his understanding of last week's decision, and <br /> 38 he thought in September the Board was just making off set cuts on which it could not decide <br /> 39 last week. <br /> 40 Travis Myren said as of now, the Board does not have years 2 and 3. He said the Board <br /> 41 is not accepting years 2 and 3 tonight. <br /> 42 Commissioner Dorosin said it is his understanding that the Board would pick up, in <br /> 43 September, where it left off on June 9t". He said the remaining conversation is to determine the <br /> 44 offsetting cuts. He said he wanted to be clear that the majority of the Board voted to move the <br /> 45 projects into years 2 and 3, and he does not want to re-visit the Board's vote in September. <br /> 46 Travis Myren said the Board can start there. <br /> 47 Commissioner Dorosin said he knows the Board can start there, but he wants to make it <br /> 48 clear that the Board is obligated to start there, due to the vote that was taken last week. He <br /> 49 said he does not want to get September and have to revote. <br />