Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-01-20; 6-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments – Clarification of Setbacks from the West Fork on the Eno Reservoir
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 09-01-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 09-01-20; 6-a - Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendments – Clarification of Setbacks from the West Fork on the Eno Reservoir
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2020 3:34:43 PM
Creation date
8/27/2020 3:15:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/1/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 09-01-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 09-01-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Minutes 09-01-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i, 27 <br /> Analysis: As required under Section 2.8.5 of the UDO, the Planning Director is required to: `... <br /> cause an analysis to be made of the application and. based upon that analysis, prepare a <br /> recommendation for consideration by the Planning Board and the Board of County <br /> Commissioners'. <br /> The amendments are necessary to address current inconsistencies within the UDO relating to <br /> the definition of what constitutes 'existing lots' and/or 'existing development' with respect to <br /> compliance with applicable reservoir setbacks. This amendment should likely have been <br /> completed in 1997 when the Town was purchasing property to establish the reservoir. <br /> Planning Board Recommendation: At its February 5, 2020 regular meeting, the Planning Board <br /> voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Statement of Consistency and the proposed <br /> UDO text amendment. Excerpts of the draft minutes from this meeting, as well as the Board's <br /> signed Statement of Consistency, are included in Attachment 3. Agenda materials from the <br /> meeting can be viewed at: https://www.co.orange.nc.us/AgendaCenter/Planning-Board-26. <br /> It should be noted the amendment presented to the Planning Board referenced changing the <br /> NPE for the West Fork on the Eno from 643 ft. to 643.9 ft. This was based on data from the <br /> Town. The amendment package now reflects the Town's corrected NPE for the reservoir of 642 <br /> ft. resulting in a slight reduction in the 150 ft. (structure) and 300 ft. (septic) setback areas <br /> around the reservoir. <br /> Planning Director Recommendation: The Planning Director recommends approval of the <br /> Statement of Consistency, as contained in Attachment 5, and the UFO Text Amendment, as <br /> contained within Attachment 6. <br /> Michael Harvey made the following PowerPoint presentation: <br /> ITEM 5 (a) - PUBLIC HEARING <br /> Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) Text Amendment —West Fork on the Eno <br /> Reservoir Setbacks <br /> Background: <br /> • County enforces setbacks for structures and septic systems as part of its Watershed <br /> Management Protection Program (Section 4.2 of the UDO inclusive) from a reservoir; <br /> • Structures are required to be 150 ft. and septic systems are required to be 300 ft. from <br /> the Normal Pool Elevation (NPE) of a reservoir; <br /> — STAFF COMMENT: We currently exceed State minimum requirements. <br /> • NPE of the reservoir is defined/referenced within Section 4.2.2 (E) of the UDO; <br /> West Fork of the Eno (aerial map) <br /> Background (continued) <br /> • Section(s) 4.2.2 (F) and (1) establishes applicability of setback standards, specifically: <br /> Section 4.2.2 (F) Existing Development - structures/septic systems installed prior <br /> to establishment of final reservoir boundary (i.e. NPE) can be replaced provided <br /> same: does not result in an increase in the amount of impervious surface. and <br /> does not encroach any farther into stream buffers or setbacks from reservoirs <br /> than the previous development. <br /> — Section 4.2.2 (1) Existing Lots - lots legally created prior to the establishment of <br /> the final boundary (i.e. NPE) of a reservoir; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.