Browse
Search
Planning Board - 090220 Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Planning Board - 090220 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2020 1:49:33 PM
Creation date
8/26/2020 1:44:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/2/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
090220 Approved ORC-Training Session Notes 9.2.2020
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2020
090220 Virtual Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 611 Franklin Garland: Thank you for taking my questions again, I know I am using a lot of the time out here. Somethings <br /> 612 that haven't been asked yet and I know this will come up later on in the meeting but are any Commissioners present <br /> 613 today for this meeting. That's one question,ok. <br /> 614 <br /> 615 Perdita Holtz: Can I go ahead and answer that and say that Commission Chair Penny Rich is on the call as an <br /> 616 attendee. <br /> 617 <br /> 618 Franklin Garland: She the only one. <br /> 619 <br /> 620 Perdita Holtz: Yes, it is not typical that BOCC members attend Planning Board meeting. <br /> 621 <br /> 622 Franklin Garland: So this is moot,what we're discussing the decision everything we're saying. <br /> 623 <br /> 624 Perdita Holtz: Well this the Planning Board meeting and there will be a public hearing before the Board of County <br /> 625 Commissioners at a future date. <br /> 626 <br /> 627 Franklin Garland: It's my understanding, and everybody that has spoken so far that this was in fact an information <br /> 628 meeting with the Commissioners present and once again it seems to me that the Planning Board is trying to sweep <br /> 629 everything under that rug. Ok, again pulling the wool in front of our eyes. Big questions for you guys, there is the <br /> 630 Research Triangle Logistic Park Company out there Terra Equity did a presentation for a hand full of people because <br /> 631 nobody else was notified and Planning Board has made it a point of not notifying all the people that really get <br /> 632 involved but just the ones that are in contact with the property. Ok, so sort of devious, ok because there are, like 1 <br /> 633 said, thousands of people that get affected by this not just the 12 parcels around it. However, big big question, we <br /> 634 did have an informational meeting on July 15'h I believe it was and they said it was going to create 4500 jobs. The <br /> 635 same argument used by the planning that was going to create this jobs for from Northern Orange County. So, this <br /> 636 was with Summit Corporation. If we have 4500 new jobs out here and that are being created for the people who live <br /> 637 in Northern Orange County, that means we're going to have approximately 4500 cars coming through Hillsborough <br /> 638 additional to the traffic that is a mess already there, in the morning and those cars are going to be returning in the <br /> 639 afternoon ok. I don't think that is exactly good planning by the way. I mean we really need a different way other than <br /> 640 Churton to get through Hillsborough and that's never going to happen but let's go ahead and double the traffic out <br /> 641 there. 4600 people that almost the population of Hillsborough that you actually adding to the traffic conditions out <br /> 642 there ok. I don't know if you guys have considered that apparently not because certainly that would require putting in <br /> 643 four lanes or at least 2 lanes in every direction and that's not in the plans either. I understand that DOT doesn't have <br /> 644 money to convert the roads at this one and to the work and Hillsborough doesn't either ok. I also, actually good <br /> 645 question out here, everything we got pretty much blindsided with Summit and it got approved. I will ask someone <br /> 646 who is in the know, Summit got approved pretty much they just blew us away and said we're going to do whatever we <br /> 647 want anyhow and you did and then they pulled out. Why did they pull out,when did they pull out,what did Terra offer <br /> 648 you that is making you do it. When did they let you know that they were going to do this and why weren't we <br /> 649 informed that this all had happened? Any care to comment on that, it is planning, this is you know obviously <br /> 650 somebody planned Summit and decided to get out of it. Somebody now trying to just pull another one over us. 1 <br /> 651 wouldn't mind if Mr. Harvey or Mr. Benedict answered this one cause apparently they're the one in charge of this and <br /> 652 1 hope they're present because they are the planning commission and if they're not there why are we even having <br /> 653 this meeting? <br /> 654 <br /> 655 Craig Benedict: I can give you a brief answer; we will provide something in writing. The developer of Settler's Point <br /> 656 received approval in January 2018. At times, developers do not stay with the project and we are not privy to why they <br /> 657 left the project, cease to exist. Another project did pick that up. <br /> 658 <br /> 659 Franklin Garland: Have you seen the damage they did back there already? And the wildlife that the displaced? 1 <br /> 660 mean they literally raised it and then abandoned it. <br /> 661 <br /> 662 David Blankfard: I think that was the tornado. <br /> 663 <br /> 664 Franklin Garland: No, no, no, no, no, no we're talking about 90 + acres that are devastated back there not tornados. <br /> 665 Raised, cut down and raised and leveled with grading already having started on it. I am just curious why they pulled <br /> 666 out. It seems like you guys would know. There would be some agreement that there have to do it since they went <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.