Browse
Search
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 12:13:04 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 11:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Settler’s Pointe Development – Traffic Impact Analysis <br />60 <br />Also, an analysis was conducted at the Service Road intersection at Old NC 86 for the 2020 <br />Build Analysis; however, since trip generation practices only provide peak hour turn movements, <br />the only da ta available for a warr ant analysis was for A M and PM peak hour s. For this <br />intersection, the 2020 Build volumes generated by the pro posed site were utilized for the AM <br />and PM peak hour traffic. Data was not formally collecte d at this int ersection with the other <br />study intersections, but the turn counts colle cted at the nearby I-40 eastbound ramps were <br />provided via a video recording, and a review of the video indicated that there were no peak hour <br />turn movements in or out of the Service Road. The Service Road provides public street access <br />to tracts of land that are presently vacant, so this is a reasonable conclusion. <br />Using HCS with 2020 p rojected traffic conditions, the intersection of Old NC 86 at the Service <br />Road met the following signal warrants: <br /> Warrant 3B: Peak Hour (Peak-Hour Vehicular Volumes) <br /> Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System <br />In similar fashion, the 2 022 Build volumes generated by th e proposed site were uti lized for the <br />AM and PM peak hour traffic for the following intersections: <br /> Old NC 86 and proposed Retail Drive <br /> Old NC 86 and Davis Road <br />Peak hour (AM and PM) turn move ment count data was co llected for the Davis Road and Old <br />NC 86 intersection on t he same day as the oth er study intersections, October 18, 2016. The <br />existing turn movement counts were then grown out to 2022 using a 1% annual growth rate, and <br />the proposed trips generated by the residentia l retirement driveway connection to the existing <br />intersection added to form the basis for the AM and PM count data. For the proposed retail <br />driveway, the projected volumes for the through move ments represent the 2022 background <br />traffic, plus the trips generated by the site itself. Similar to the scenario with the Service Road, <br />the only data used for the warrant analysis at the Retail Drive intersection and Davis Road <br />intersection warrant analysis was the peak hour turn movement counts. <br />Using HCS with 2022 projected traf fic conditions, the intersection of Old NC 86 at the Retail <br />Drive met the following signal warrants: <br /> Warrant 3B: Peak Hour (Peak-Hour Vehicular Volumes) <br /> Warrant 6: Coordinated Signal System <br />Additionally, the intersection of Old NC 86 at Davis Road met the following signal warrant: <br /> Warrant 3B: Peak Hour (Peak-Hour Vehicular Volumes) <br />HCS reports for the signal warrant analysis are located in Appendix D. <br />61
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.