Browse
Search
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 12:13:04 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 11:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D R A F T <br /> <br />Hunter Spitzer: Seconded.1559 <br />1560 <br />Adam Beeman: I vote going ahead and solving the problem tonight if anybody else is ready to vote. I’m ready to 1561 <br />vote. I’m got my choices made so if everybody else wants to shelve it that’s fine but I’m ready to move forward 1562 <br />tonight.1563 <br />1564 <br />Kim Piracci: I would like to postpone voting but to me it doesn’t make sense to meet in two weeks if we haven’t 1565 <br />heard from the DOT though it could be a conditional two weeks from tonight sort of thing.1566 <br />1567 <br />Michael Harvey: Kim, let me just interject that it unfortunately can’t be conditional you are going to be adjourning to a 1568 <br />date and time certain so there will be a meeting if you all elect to do it this way on the 19th and if we don’t have the 1569 <br />response unfortunately we don’t have the response and I hate to say it that way but it’s the truth. The two options 1570 <br />you have are to adjourn this meeting matter or table this matter until the September meeting which obviously the 1571 <br />applicant I know has a concern with or to say you’re going to attempt to do a special meeting on the 19th. If there’s 1572 <br />Board consensus to try that and we don’t have answers, we don’t have answers. That’s the unfortunately blunt way 1573 <br />I’m going to have to put it to you.1574 <br />1575 <br />Randy Marshall: Part of my thinking was that we still have a number of people who wanted to address this some of 1576 <br />them we may have already have heard from and understand what their positions are but there may be others that 1577 <br />we’ve not heard from at all and I’m not sure we want to start listening to them at this late time. The other things is 1578 <br />we’ve not been able to address the DOT issues and nothing may change as Michael suggests in two weeks but at 1579 <br />least in two weeks we will have a little bit more information and can get a little bit more input from the public and 1580 <br />make an informed decision at that time. I can vote tonight, I know where I stand but I just want to make sure that 1581 <br />everybody feels like they’ve had enough opportunity to get all the information they need or to provide all the 1582 <br />information they need.1583 <br />1584 <br />David Blankfard: I think that we should postpone it to the 19th. I guess we’ll have to have a motion again. But we’ll 1585 <br />wait and until the 19th we can listen to more of the constituents, the public right because they were saying they were 1586 <br />not notified this will give them more time to rally their forces and then if the DOT isn’t there, we’ll just listen to the 1587 <br />public and if the DOT we can finish it then and there. 1588 <br />1589 <br />Craig Benedict: Perdita how many people do you have still want to speak tonight?1590 <br />1591 <br />Perdita Holtz: There are 14 people that have their hands raised.1592 <br />1593 <br />Adam Beeman: I have a question if we come back on the 19th and we don’t have the information from DOT are we 1594 <br />going to push it out again.1595 <br />1596 <br />David Blankfard: We’ll just listen to the public.1597 <br />1598 <br />Adam Beeman: I understand that but are we going to push the vote out again or are we going to vote on the 19th? 1599 <br />1600 <br />Randy Marshall: I suggest that we have a vote on the 19th we’ll have all the information available and I think we 1601 <br />should go ahead and vote then and I would also recommend for people who want to speak, to try not to continue to 1602 <br />repeat yourselves and to provide us with new information or insight which will help us get closer to making a decision.1603 <br />1604 <br />Michael Harvey: Chair Blankfard, just to remind the Board that if you adjourn the meeting to a date and time certain 1605 <br />and adjourn to a specific format, we will not be resending out notifications because this is a continuation of the 1606 <br />meeting. We will not be sending out new notices, we’re not obligated to send out new notices because you are 1607 <br />adjourning to a date time certain. We will post it on the website as we have done with tonight’s meeting but we will 1608 <br />not be sending out notices to everyone within 1000 feet.1609 <br />1610 <br />MOTION by Randy Marshall to adjourn the Planning Board meeting to August 19, 2020 at 7:00 PM via Zoom. 1611 <br />Seconded by Hunter Spitzer.1612 <br />VOTE:9-2 (Adam Beeman and Kim Piracci opposed)1613 <br />1614 <br />31
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.