Browse
Search
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 12:13:04 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 11:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D R A F T <br /> <br />absolutely wrong thing for this area. I can’t emphasize that enough this is a residential area. In the 1980s when this 1391 <br />plan was originally developed, my house was a cow pasture so sure put a warehouse there it doesn’t matter to them1392 <br />but things have changed dramatically, it doesn’t make sense to have this development here any longer so Planning 1393 <br />Board please hear me I’m begging you, oppose this. Please don’t make my family collateral damage from this 1394 <br />economic development building.1395 <br />1396 <br />Jon Lorusso: Hello, it’s quite late thank you for giving me a chance to speak. I wrote down a few notes of what I’d 1397 <br />like to say before I get to them I just want to agree with previous speaker this really does come down to a 40 year old 1398 <br />plan that is no longer relevant and yet the Planning Board feels that they need to stick with it because it’s on the 1399 <br />books so we might as well, I’m almost tempted to say that there is some kind of conspiracy going on some kickbacks 1400 <br />because there really, this is the Planning Board, you are supposed to plan for the communities and the people who 1401 <br />live here. Not for out of state businesses, not for lawyers in Raleigh this is for the people, you work for us the people 1402 <br />who live here. Yes, the people here need jobs but not at the expense of their fellow citizens, this is absurd. So just 1403 <br />to go through a few points. The traffic engineer mentioned that is would be up to the individual truck drivers whether 1404 <br />or not they took 40 west to get to 85 north that’s absurd no one would ever do that. People who live here know that 1405 <br />you wouldn’t do that, you are obviously going to take Churton to get 85 north. We’ve already had, the Planning 1406 <br />Board has a plan in action to extend 70 from Orange Grove because of already existing traffic issues. They already 1407 <br />exist the traffic issues this is going to make it so much worse and yet are we planning or are we reacting. We’re going 1408 <br />to allow this to be built and then react later on. We’ll figure it out 20 years from now when people are fed up. So, this 1409 <br />neighborhood, one if the improvement that Mr. Birch mentioned was oh we get a traffic signal at the end of Davis 1410 <br />Road and all we have to do it to get it is build a 2.1 million square foot warehouse inside of our neighborhood. Great 1411 <br />thanks a lot thank you for that wonderful improvement. The left only sign coming out of the place onto Davis Road, 1412 <br />are there any laws that, is there going to be a cop stationed there and if they make a right are they subject to a 1413 <br />summons? A ticket? No, it’s really just up to the individual driver if they see that the traffic is backed up to the light 1414 <br />on Old 86 you know maybe I’ll just make a right and take Orange Grove up or maybe I’ll make a left on Orange 1415 <br />Grove and go down to Arthur Minnis, who cares right? Who cares about the people who live here, who cares. 200 1416 <br />vehicles per hour additional on Davis Road that is absurd an average tractor-trailer is 72 feet. How many tractor-1417 <br />trailers can fit between Old 86 and 1000 foot entrance on Davis Road? I don’t know what the math is divide 1000 by 1418 <br />72 it’s somewhere around 14. If you have 200 per hour, it sounds to me like it’s going to get backed up. It sounds to 1419 <br />me like there’s a lot of conjecture, a lot of estimates based on businesses that we don’t even know what kind of traffic 1420 <br />they’ll have. I think Michael Birch again that the primary use is indoor yet he doesn’t actually know what kind of 1421 <br />business is going to be there. How does he know they’re going to be indoor? They’re asking for approval when 1422 <br />they’re still back and forth with NCDOT how can you approve something when thinks haven’t even been settled? We 1423 <br />are not talking about little things; we’re talking about huge changes. Oh, the traffic is backed up on 40 west, on the 1424 <br />40 east who cares if there’s an ambulance that can’t get to the hospital, who cares right? It’s all at the expense of 1425 <br />business, who cares, who cares if people are backed up on the highway, who cares? I mean this is absurd; it’s 1426 <br />absurd that our Planning Board the people who are supposed to plan this are the ones that are selling up the river. 1427 <br />It’s crazy. I could expect it from the lawyers in Raleigh who don’t care what happens here because they don’t live 1428 <br />here. They’re going to get this signed and they’re done they get their check but from our own Planning Board the 1429 <br />people who are supposed to protect the citizens of this county they are the ones who are selling us up the river. It’s 1430 <br />insane, it really is insane. That’s all I have to say.1431 <br />1432 <br />David Blankfard: One thing, did you receive a letter from the planning department?1433 <br />1434 <br />Jon Lorusso: No I did not.1435 <br />1436 <br />Perdita Holtz: David as you can see there are 12 people with their hands up and it now 11 p.m. I don’t know if there 1437 <br />wants to be any discussion among the Planning Board on how to handle the rest of the meeting, what some options 1438 <br />might be. 1439 <br />1440 <br />Hunter Spitzer: I do recall that Michael had some comments that he wanted to make pertaining to us making 1441 <br />recommendation. So I would like to hear those at the very least before we move forward.1442 <br />1443 <br />Michael Harvey: As I indicated, your abstract had suggested that the Board, if they felt comfortable, would make a 1444 <br />recommendation in time for the County Commissioner’s September 15th hearing. Obviously the applicant will also 1445 <br />need to weigh in on this. As I see it, there’s a couple of different options and scenarios here. Through no fault of the 1446 <br />28
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.