Browse
Search
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Planning Board - 081920 Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 12:13:04 PM
Creation date
8/17/2020 11:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/19/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
081920 Spec Planning Board Minutes
(Message)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Orange County Planning Board\Minutes\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D R A F T <br /> <br />Hunter Spitzer: This is more of a question for the planning staff. There are UDO regulations to control that correct? 1167 <br />Fuel storage.1168 <br />1169 <br />Michael Harvey: It’s actually regulated by the North Carolina State Fire Code, not necessarily by zoning. In terms of 1170 <br />distance from structure, how stored, how protected, and how maintained it’s actually going to be addressed through 1171 <br />compliance with the fire code and what I want to remind everybody that site plans that are submitted have to go 1172 <br />through the development review process with Orange County which requires the fire marshal’s office to sign off on 1173 <br />them. That is going to be a component of any and all review. So this will come up at the appropriate time by the 1174 <br />appropriate entity if proposed.1175 <br />1176 <br />Hunter Spitzer: Can I simply request that the developer agree as a condition not to put fuel storage adjacent to their 1177 <br />vegetative buffer of the flood plain.1178 <br />1179 <br />Michael Birch: Yes, we can agree to that.1180 <br />1181 <br />David Blankfard: This is a question for Michael, is the building height determined by how tall the fire department can 1182 <br />raise their ladder?1183 <br />1184 <br />Michael Harvey: So Mr. Blankfard let me answer that question this way, obviously there are height limits enforced 1185 <br />under Orange County General Use Zoning Districts and 60 feet is the potential building height that would be allowed. 1186 <br />You are correct that building height is usually determined by the available or one of the factors in determining 1187 <br />allowable building height is available infrastructure to fight fire. I think that without putting words in the applicant’s 1188 <br />mouth or stealing their thunder, I think one of the reasons this site has so much traction is because the availability of 1189 <br />water and sewer service is there will be potential for sprinklered buildings that would address some of that as well. 1190 <br />There’s also, in their narrative discussions about the potential to allow for water towers on the property that might be 1191 <br />used in addressing that very particular issue as well.1192 <br />1193 <br />David Blankfard: Is there any requirements for high beams on the trucks and cars spilling over our property line? 1194 <br />Something similar to what happens in parking decks?1195 <br />1196 <br />Michael Birch: I think that’s likely addressed through the vegetated buffer around the perimeter. I think largely, I 1197 <br />think Michael Harvey can correct me if I’m wrong, largely the County’s Lighting Ordinance with regard to site lighting 1198 <br />but again I think we anticipate that vegetated buffer around the perimeter of the site would mitigate those headlights.1199 <br />1200 <br />Michael Harvey: Chair Blankfard, this is Michael Harvey, Mr. Birch is correct our lighting regulations particularly 1201 <br />address outdoor lighting, building security lighting and whatnot they don’t address or they are not designed to 1202 <br />address lights from vehicles.1203 <br />1204 <br />David Blankfard: Would the developer be willing to try to mitigate those high beams?1205 <br />1206 <br />Michael Birch: I think we’re trying to through the use of those perimeter buffer yards and also one, the vegetation 1207 <br />and two the distance and also the location of where our parking area are or anticipate them to be. I think it would be 1208 <br />hard for us to articulate an objective standard but just to answer your question more broadly, I think yes we will try to 1209 <br />mitigate that but it’s hard for me to think of an objective standard that we could apply as a condition.1210 <br />1211 <br />Melissa Poole: So you don’t have actual companies going into this location into this space yet, is that correct?1212 <br />1213 <br />Michael Birch: That’s correct.1214 <br />1215 <br />Melissa Poole: Ok, so if you’re looking at manufacturing and possibly laboratory and research are you looking at that 1216 <br />they would have the ability to operate multiple shifts?1217 <br />1218 <br />Michael Birch: Yes, potentially a building user could have multiple shifts that is correct?1219 <br />1220 <br />Melissa Poole: So, back to, I want to jump back to just to a moment to David, when he talking about particularly the 1221 <br />residents most closely situated towards the lines, I mean I guess my question is how can you guarantee this will not 1222 <br />24
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.