Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
D R A F T <br /> <br />Adam Beeman: Motion to approve the item – I don’t have it in front of me. A motion to approve the amendment for 723 <br />the zoning for the COCA and FLUM.724 <br />725 <br />Tom Altieri: In the motion, sorry for interrupting, the motion would be to approve the resolution that is provided in 726 <br />your packet as attachment 3 and that outlines the amendment and the parcels to be amended if indeed the Planning 727 <br />Board wants to recommend approval they would do so by virtue of approving the resolution that you have.728 <br />729 <br />Adam Beeman: I move to approve Tom’s resolution.730 <br />731 <br />Kim Piracci: Wait a second, I really... I would like to hear from Michael Harvey before I vote on anything. Do I have to 732 <br />vote to hear from Michael Harvey? 733 <br />734 <br />David Blankfard: You can ask Michael anything.735 <br />736 <br />Kim Piracci: Isn’t he going to present tonight?737 <br />738 <br />David Blankfard: Yes, the next one.739 <br />740 <br />Craig Benedict: The next two items.741 <br />742 <br />David Blankfard: We’ve got a long way to go. Tom spoke on this item.743 <br />744 <br />Tom Altieri: I’m sorry, I did not hear. I think the motion on the floor is to approve the Land Use Plan amendments 745 <br />through the resolution. I believe Mrs. Piracci’s question is with regard to the rezoning and there are actually two 746 <br />rezonings on the agenda but I think the one that she is referring to is Item 10, the MPD-CZ that Michael Harvey has a 747 <br />presentation to introduce that item. This is for the Land Use Plan amendments and does not include the rezoning.748 <br />749 <br />Randy Marshall: I am prepared to read the proposal if you want to hear it from the agenda packet.750 <br />751 <br />MOTION by Randy Marshall to approve the amendment. The requirements of Section 2.8 of the UDO have been 752 <br />deemed complete pursuant to Sections 1.1.5 and 1.1.7 of the UDO and Section 153a to 341 of the North Carolina 753 <br />General Statutes the Board finds sufficient documentation within the record denoting that the amendment is 754 <br />consistent with the adopted 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is reasonable and in the public interest 755 <br />because it supports modifying existing non-residential zoning designations in an effort to provide each property 756 <br />owner with an opportunity/path forward for the reasonable development of their property. I would recommend that 757 <br />the Planning Board recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that they consider adoption of the proposed 758 <br />Zoning Atlas amendments. Seconded by Adam Beeman. 759 <br />760 <br />ROLLCALL VOTE:761 <br />Carrie Fletcher: No762 <br />Adam Beeman: For it763 <br />Hunter Spitzer: No764 <br />Melissa Poole: No765 <br />Randy Marshall: Yes766 <br />Kim Piracci: No767 <br />Patricia Roberts: Yes768 <br />Susan Hunter: Yes769 <br />Alexandra Allman: Yes770 <br />David Blankfard: Yes771 <br />MOTION PASSED 6-4772 <br />773 <br />774 <br />AGENDA ITEM 9: ZONING ATLAS AMENDMENT (GENERAL USE REZONING)-To review and make a recommendation to 775 <br />the BOCC on a County-initiated action to rezone 8 parcels totaling 45.96 acres from MPD-CZ 776 <br />(Settler’s Point) to EDH-4 (Economic Development Hillsborough Office/Retail) (1 parcel 32.76 777 <br />acres in size) or EDH-2 (Economic Development Hillsborough Limited Office) (7 parcels totaling 778 <br />16