Browse
Search
Climate Council Meeting Summary - 5-28-2020
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Climate Council
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
Climate Council Meeting Summary - 5-28-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 11:44:52 AM
Creation date
8/17/2020 11:43:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/28/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Climate Council Agenda - 5-28-2020
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Climate Council\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monast said that the changes would not likely be difficult but welcomed her assistance if <br /> she wanted to help. <br /> Cole then volunteered Rubinoff to assist with the edits as well. <br /> McCullough then said that the changes that Rubinoff had suggested are logical and would <br /> be easy to include such as non-offensive examples like bicycle and pedestrian <br /> infrastructure. <br /> Monast objected based on process and personal reasons to the inclusion of examples. If the <br /> Council was to include a list of example actions, we should all agree on those examples, and <br /> also providing examples runs the risk of looking like those specific projects are the main <br /> points of the letter, rather than providing the context and reframing what we are trying to <br /> accomplish with COVID relief.Also keeping the letter broad will make it and the reframing <br /> we are proposing more acceptable to people across the state who may define resilience in <br /> different ways. <br /> McCullough agreed that those were good points. <br /> Marcoplos also pointed out that the motion had passed without including the examples. <br /> The Council can always address that later as we will have other opportunities during the <br /> long recovery. <br /> VI. Succession planning for Chair,Vice-Chair,and student members— <br /> Due to time constraints, Marcoplos suggested that this item be brought back on the June <br /> meeting agenda. <br /> Bouma agreed and reinforced its importance as student members and leadership would <br /> soon be cycling off. <br /> Additional discussion not on printed agenda - <br /> Marcoplos attempted to introduce Crystal Cavalier, but she had just dropped off at 4:30. <br /> Marcoplos then called upon a few members who had been quiet during the meeting and <br /> asked if they had anything to add. <br /> DuBose said that he was happy to be a part of the group and was glad we made a decision <br /> to move the letter forward. He also asked that in preparation for the succession planning <br /> discussion,that a proposal be prepared for the Council to review and comment on. <br /> Bouma then agreed that was a good idea and offered to go back into the minutes to review <br /> consensus decisions of the Council on the topic of succession made last fall, and provide <br /> that as context. He would also work with the Chair and Vice-Chair to see if they wanted to <br /> propose anything more. <br /> DuBose said that would be fine, and just highlighted the utility of having something to <br /> generate and focus the discussion around. <br /> Ryerson then said that he echoed the decisions others had made about keeping the letter <br /> broad and moving it forward quickly given the timeline of relief distribution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.