Browse
Search
Climate Council Meeting Summary - 5-28-2020
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Climate Council
>
Minutes
>
2020
>
Climate Council Meeting Summary - 5-28-2020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2020 11:44:52 AM
Creation date
8/17/2020 11:43:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/28/2020
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Climate Council Agenda - 5-28-2020
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Climate Council\Agendas\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
helpful to refer to: Emergency phase, early recovery phase, resilience phase. If the next <br /> phase of the state's response is aligned with early recovery type actions it would be good to <br /> follow that context. <br /> Slade then said that the counterpoint to being very specific, is that we might be in this for a <br /> long time and recovery depends on federal leadership.This letter might be better received <br /> by the next government. <br /> Rubinoff then asked if this letter is political, how do we distribute it? <br /> Marcoplos said that if there is value in having governments across the state sign on to the <br /> letter, we do not have much time. It's still worth the time to do this even if we can only get <br /> a few additional supporters identified. <br /> Kauffman said that in the progressive caucus,they included 3 principles of FDR's plan Relief, <br /> Recovery, Reform. <br /> Monast responded to Marcoplos's point about the number of meetings, do we want to <br /> move forward with this letter as is, or take the time to develop a more complete letter. <br /> Monast indicated his opinion that it's more valuable to send the letter as-is to help the <br /> governor frame the issue even if the letter is general. <br /> Janway agreed and stated a question for staff. Does this letter represent the Towns?Staff <br /> representative might not have the capacity to sign on as they are not elected officials. <br /> Marcoplos said that he thought the letter needs to come from the elected bodies. <br /> Trueblood said that the Council would ask the governments to sign. We don't know what <br /> the next phases will be but the Governor would be one good audience and then the federal <br /> legislators would be good as well. <br /> Marcoplos called for a decision. <br /> Rubinoff agreed that we should not send this out ourselves without involving the other <br /> elected bodies in the County. <br /> Marcoplos confirmed. <br /> McCullough said that she was excited about sending the letter, and might have comments <br /> but agreed with getting the letter out. She pointed out that the Council is more than just <br /> the local governments. We are non-profits and the community as well. If we send all <br /> communications through the governments, we might lose that synergy of representation <br /> that we have. <br /> Slade then reinforced the importance of the WHO letter in aligning the interests of COVID <br /> response and climate change. <br /> Clayton then weighed in to say she agreed and thanked everyone for the work. She <br /> reinforced that if we want to send a letter we should go ahead and not wait any longer. <br /> Marcoplos then asked for a quick show of hands to see who might want to move the letter <br /> forward. He saw a majority of hands and then asked if Monast would feel comfortable <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.