Orange County NC Website
16 <br /> approve these appointments tonight. She said there is also a question of whether the BOCC <br /> wants to change its advisory policy to allow electronic meetings. She said currently the BOCC <br /> meets electronically, but advisory boards are not meeting, unless they have a statutory <br /> requirement to do so. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said she is in favor of approving all of these appointments <br /> tonight with one motion, unless a commissioner needs more information. <br /> Commissioner Greene said she advocated for voting tonight, but would be fine with <br /> waiting until June 2na <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said since it is only two weeks until June 2nd he is happy to wait, <br /> and as long as the Board preserves the conversation he is fine. He said he is willing to be <br /> flexible and vote as needed, when needed. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos supported voting tonight, and the desire was to be able to <br /> have conversations, which the Board has accomplished. He said voting the same night as the <br /> discussions seems efficient and speeds things up. He said he would support always doing this. <br /> Commissioner McKee said the Orange County Board of Commissioners can do what it <br /> wants to do with its own procedures. He said he is happy either way. <br /> Commissioner Price said as long as there are no controversies, she is fine to vote at a <br /> work session. She said voting at a regular meeting is only a formality. <br /> Chair Rich said the desire seems to be to leave the procedure in place for the future, so <br /> discussions can take place, but to vote on these appointments tonight. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin referred to the electronic meeting policy, and said he fully <br /> supports changing it to allow advisory boards to meet electronically. <br /> John Roberts said, at the time the policy was created, the Board was concerned that <br /> appointees would not show up, but just call in. He said this could be addressed by allowing <br /> electronic meetings to occur only during declared states of emergency. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said it has become apparent in recent weeks that a lot can be <br /> done without face-to-face participation. He said he would encourage people to meet in person, <br /> but if not, other means should be acceptable. <br /> Chair Rich asked if this policy were to change, on whom would the responsibility fall to <br /> set up the electronic meetings. <br /> Donna baker said the staff liaison and the advisory board chair would work together. <br /> She said some standardized guidelines might help to insure that open meeting laws are being <br /> met. <br /> John Roberts said the meeting being open is the most important element. <br /> Thom Freeman said meeting electronically may broaden the pool of willing volunteers, <br /> as those who cannot physically attend meetings, may now be willing to serve. <br /> Commissioner Greene said it may also get younger people, with children, to be willing to <br /> serve. <br /> Commissioner Bedford said when the policy was created it is likely that video <br /> capabilities were not what they are now. She said these are different times, and virtual <br /> meetings allow real participation. She said the only issue may be access to stable/reliable <br /> Internet. <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said there are 2 questions: 1.) whether the entire board meets <br /> virtually during an emergency, and 2.) post crisis, does virtual attendance continue to be <br /> permissible. He said he would say yes to both questions, for the valid reasons already outlined. <br /> He said face-to-face meetings are preferred, but virtual participation is effective, and this should <br /> be maximized. <br /> Chair Rich said this sounds like two policies: one for a state of emergency, where all <br /> meetings would be virtual, with staff helping with technology needs. She said the second policy <br />