Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-16-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2020
>
Agenda - 06-16-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 06-16-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/12/2020 8:54:27 AM
Creation date
6/12/2020 8:15:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/16/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 06-16-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2020\Agenda - 06-16-20 Virtual Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
12 <br /> <br />Project is connected to water and sewer service, will connect to existing service, or will use a <br />community well and sewer system consistent with water and sewer boundary agreements and <br />local standards 5 <br />Additional points may be awarded for meeting aspects associated with functionality, maintenance and <br />dispersal. <br />2 <br /> 1 <br />PUBLIC COMMENT: 2 <br /> Delores Bailey, Executive Director of EmPOWERment, said during this pandemic they 3 <br />have supported many areas of their community, and she listed these. She said 4 <br />EmPOWERment closed on 3 apartments and one piece of property during this pandemic. She 5 <br />said her concern with this application is whether it allows for purchases and rehabs. She said 6 <br />EmPOWERment’s inventory is full, and it is imperative that EmPOWERment receives funding 7 <br />from this bond. She said EmPOWERment will be at a disadvantage with the larger housing 8 <br />non-profits, with the scoring rubric as it stands. 9 <br /> Commissioner Price referred to the eligible projects on page 37, which says no more 10 <br />than 20%of the properties can be set aside for those with disabilities. She asked if those that 11 <br />would be included in this could be identified, and if this is seeking to discourage group homes. 12 <br /> Emila Sutton said the intent is that people with disabilities have full choice where they 13 <br />can live, to prevent discrimination. She said this limits hard set aside units to 20%. 14 <br />Commissioner Price referred to the next page, and said one of the reasons not to be 15 <br />considered is that an applicant has previously demonstrated poor past performance or 16 <br />compliance with funding guidelines. She asked if this pertains to County programs, and how 17 <br />many years back will they be looking. 18 <br /> Emila Sutton said she was not sure how this was defined in past applications, and they 19 <br />can take recommendations. She said reviewing three years of compliance history would be 20 <br />reasonable. 21 <br /> Commissioner Price said if one had an issue in years past, but it is good standing now, 22 <br />she would want them to be considered. 23 <br /> Commissioner Price referred to construction detail, and asked if consideration would be 24 <br />given to universal design that provides flexibility, so people can stay in their homes. She asked 25 <br />if points would be given for that. 26 <br /> Emila Sutton said yes. 27 <br /> Commissioner Price asked if this would have to be built in. 28 <br /> Commissioner Dorosin said it is already included in the checklist on page 38. 29 <br /> Commissioner Greene said it is in the scoring criteria, giving 3 points. 30 <br /> Commissioner Price said the applicant would get extra points for designating units for 31 <br />Orange County residents, and asked if there is a method to monitor this. 32 <br /> Emila Sutton said it is a part of the scoring criteria, and would be indicated in the 33 <br />application. She is not aware of any residency monitoring. 34 <br /> Commissioner Price said it would require taking the developer at their word. 35 <br /> Emila Sutton said she is not aware of any way to monitor residency status. 36 <br />Commissioner Price referred to the conflicts of interest portion, and asked if Mebane will 37 <br />be included. 38 <br />Emila Sutton said yes, she can include Mebane. 39 <br />Commissioner Dorosin asked if the concern to which Delores Bailey eluded could be 40 <br />clarified; that EmPOWERment would be at a disadvantage to the larger non-profits. 41 <br />Emila Sutton said the way the application is written does not include acquisition and 42 <br />rehab as eligible uses of funds. 43
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.