Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-02-20; 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Agenda - 06-02-20 Virtual Business Meeting
>
Agenda - 06-02-20; 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2020 4:30:20 PM
Creation date
5/28/2020 4:47:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/2/2020
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda 06-02-20 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 06-02-20 Virtual Business Meeting
Minutes 06-02-2020 Virtual Business Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2020's\2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> 1 <br /> 2 PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> 3 Tony Blake said Commissioner Dorosin was kind enough to respond to his email, and <br /> 4 provided more current conversations that have taken place. He said he supports the <br /> 5 discussion and thinks improvements could be made, but he has the following concerns <br /> 6 about pushing this change through too quickly. He summarized his concerns: <br /> 7 • As is stands right now, the "voting method" agenda item 6-b lacks <br /> 8 definition and a suggested plan/model for discussion. <br /> 9 • Discussion of changing the voting method is too important to be rushed. <br /> 10 • Data is old and there is not enough time to collect/update the data, have <br /> 11 the discussion and get feedback before the 2020, election. <br /> 12 • A target of 2020 would put a lot of pressure on staff who are already <br /> 13 dealing with emergency conditions and budget concerns. <br /> 14 • Meeting "virtually" is still somewhat less effective than face to face. <br /> 15 • Part of the BOCC is "lame duck", and it is important that the newly elected <br /> 16 commissioners be a part of driving this conversation. <br /> 17 • The 2020 census results may change things and require a new look within <br /> 18 2 years, resulting in wasted efforts. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Commissioner Dorosin thanked Tony Blake for his comments, and others the <br /> 21 BOCC received. <br /> 22 Commissioner Dorosin said he does not have concerns about the 2020 primary, <br /> 23 but rather the primary illustrated some if the issues that have been discussed in Orange <br /> 24 County for the past few years. <br /> 25 Commissioner Dorosin summarized his comments, which are in the agenda. He <br /> 26 said he has been talking about this since 2016, and this is an on-going issue with the <br /> 27 Board but the Board has not made any decisions. He said November is the earliest <br /> 28 possible time to make changes, and that may be too soon, but if the majority of the <br /> 29 Board does not want to do anything, then it should vote as such, and move on. He said it <br /> 30 is his preference that the County moves to 7 single-member districts. He said the <br /> 31 primary highlighted that the district one presidential year race is the only seat on the <br /> 32 county commission that is a multimember election, and all others are single member <br /> 33 elections. He said the multimember seat is the only multimember seat on the ballot, <br /> 34 which is confusing to the public. <br /> 35 Commissioner Dorosin said they need an electoral system where commissioners <br /> 36 are all elected the same way, and that is by single member districts. He said another <br /> 37 important issue is that the County will have to draw the districts once the census comes <br /> 38 out, and it is important for the BOCC to make decisions now and do everything at one <br /> 39 time. <br /> 40 Commissioner Dorosin said there have been concerns that going to single <br /> 41 member districts will lead to dominance by the southern part of Orange County, i.e.: <br /> 42 Chapel Hill and Carrboro. He said he feels these concerns are overblown, and in the last <br /> 43 two at large elections residents have elected representatives that live in the Chapel Hill <br /> 44 area. <br /> 45 Commissioner Dorosin said one of the challenges with multi-member districts, is <br /> 46 that they encourage voters to do single shot voting. He said this is a legitimate strategy, <br /> 47 but not necessarily a fair one. <br /> 48 Commissioner Marcoplos said this is a complicated issue. He said in 1992 there <br /> 49 was a group who discussed this, and recommended cumulative voting. He said he <br /> 50 disagrees that single district is the most democratic way to go, and proportional <br /> 51 representation is used by a majority of countries around the world, and does not require <br /> 52 districts. He agreed it is important to not rush this discussion, and to engage the public. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.