Browse
Search
Minutes 04-28-2020 Virtual Joint Meeting w-Schools
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2020
>
Minutes 04-28-2020 Virtual Joint Meeting w-Schools
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2020 11:22:55 AM
Creation date
5/20/2020 8:58:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/28/2020
Meeting Type
Schools
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda 04-28-20 Joint Meeting with Durham Tech, Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools, and Orange County Schools
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 04-28-20 Virtual Joint Meeting With Schools
Agenda 04-28-20 Abstract 1-4 Joint Meeting Abstract with Durham Technical Community College, Chapel Hill Carrboro City Schools, and Orange County Schools
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 04-28-20 Virtual Joint Meeting With Schools
Agenda 04-28-20 Attachment A - FY2020-21 Budget Projections Pre-COVID vs. Post-COVID PowerPoint Presentation
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 04-28-20 Virtual Joint Meeting With Schools
Agenda 04-28-20 Attachment B - Durham Technical Community College - Orange County Campus FY2020-21 Operating Budget Request
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 04-28-20 Virtual Joint Meeting With Schools
Agenda 04-28-20 Attachment C - Orange County Schools Board of Education FY2020-21 Operating Budget Request
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 04-28-20 Virtual Joint Meeting With Schools
Agenda 04-28-20 Attachment D - Chapel Hill - Carrboro City Schools Board of Education FY2020-21 Operating Budget Request
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2020\Agenda - 04-28-20 Virtual Joint Meeting With Schools
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br /> <br />Commissioner Bedford asked if staff could report how the pandemic has affected both <br />campuses this spring semester. <br />Dr. Ingram said DTCC went on-line with all of its classes within 2 weeks. He said, of the <br />500 sections of classes, all but 25 were converted to online. <br />Dr. Ingram said Durham Tech’s summer term will be online as well, and DTCC hopes to <br />do face classes in the fall sometime. He said Durham Tech will receive $2.8 million from the <br />CARE Act, which will be used for student aid. He said Durham Tech is learning how to use <br />virtual platforms for many of their internal operations. <br />Commissioner Price thanked both Penny Gluck and Dr. Ingram for all of their work over <br />the years. <br />Commissioner Price referred to the Orange County building 2, and asked if Durham <br />Tech could make these slides available to the BOCC. <br />Commissioner Price said a couple of years ago there were concept plans, and asked if <br />there is a specific point where this process is on hold. <br />Dr. Ingram said a couple of years ago Durham Tech had some preliminary discussions <br />about what it wanted to offer in its second building. He said, this spring, County staff told <br />Durham Tech that plans are to move this project to year 6-10 in Orange County’s CIP, and that <br />is why Durham Tech put a hold on significant planning for now. He said more planning will be <br />done closer to when the building will be built. He said the Orange County Board of <br />Commissioners asked about this last week, and that is why he added the slide. He said it <br />shows a breakdown of how Durham Tech will need the funding over the three years. <br />Commissioner Price asked if Durham Tech still has the plans from two years ago, or will <br />everything start from scratch. <br />Dr. Ingram said what they saw in the past was a high level, conceptual plan, and a land <br />use plan that included how many parking spots would be needed. He said Durham Tech would <br />look for designers to help the school program plan if they moved forward. He said the site plan <br />from the past appears to have been more in the parking arena, and that was all it was. <br />Commissioner Dorosin referred to the $1.4 million CARE funds, which have been drawn <br />down, and asked if its specific uses could be identified. <br />Dr. Ingram said Durham Tech is developing the program for these funds, and additional <br />requirements from the Department of Education came down. He said this round of funding will <br />not be able to be used to offset tuition, and it will be distributed based on need. He said <br />students will submit an application, and it can be used for rent or groceries, but will not be able <br />to be used to offset tuition bills students have incurred. He said the second round of $1.4 million <br />will have more flexibility in what it can be spent on. He said the students had already paid for <br />tuition for this semester, and there is no legal provision to refund it. He said Durham Tech will <br />use some of the second round of funding for those students that had to withdraw and had paid <br />tuition. He said it will be in the form of a credit for future use. He said the flexibility of the <br />second round will help the college to recoup some of its expenses due to the pandemic. <br />Ashton Powell asked if Durham Tech’s online delivery has altered the UNC system <br />comprehensive articulation agreements, or the transferred admissions policies. <br />Dr. Ingram said that is a moving target and, as of now, it has not. He said Durham Tech <br />moved from a graded system to a pass/fail system, and the university is leaving it to local <br />campuses as to whether or not to make that decision. He said most university campuses do not <br />accept the no pass/fail option in transfers. He said some students have said that they do not <br />want to go to a pass/no pass/fail option. He said the system has provided some guidance that <br />universities can accept a “high pass” (C or better) but universities do not have to accept that. <br />He said Durham Tech is polling faculty to consider pass/fail option, and his sense is that most <br />faculty will remain with the graded option. <br />Dr. Ingram said he has heard some chatter that graduating high school students are <br />considering foregoing traditional university and going to community colleges instead, due to the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.