Orange County NC Website
12 <br /> <br />Travis Myren asked if an annual review of the projects, how they have performed over <br />time, would be sufficient. <br />Chair Rich said everything the County spends this ¼ cent tax on should be measured. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos referred to page 8, and read the following: “The rooftop solar <br />projects proposed for each school district is proposed to work through a grant to provide the <br />schools with flexibility while preserving the ability of the County to track progress and impact.” <br />He said this says the grantee must provide a reference of sharing information in a report. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said it is the Climate Council’s practice that everyone at the <br />table is sharing information about their projects, and it is important to learn collectively. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said suggested that a quarterly report come back on all of these <br />projects, such as weatherizations. <br />Commissioner Dorosin reflected on the process of this particular issue. He said two <br />weeks ago the schools did not want these projects, and now the schools have reviewed and <br />accepted the projects. He said the process worked very well. <br />Chair Rich said the timeframe was good. <br />Commissioner McKee said he has no doubt the solar projects will be beneficial in the <br />long run, but he did have an issue with the process. He said he believed the Board could have <br />addressed, and reduced, school capital projects already in the queue that have equal climate <br />value, thus killing two birds with one stone. He said the Board set an expectation and backed <br />the schools in a corner, and he does not blame the schools for taking the project at this point, if <br />the alternative was to refuse it and complete no projects. He said he will vote against this item. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said Commissioner McKee’s characterization of the process was <br />not accurate. He said if the schools had other projects, the Board invited the schools to submit <br />them to the Board for evaluation. <br />Commissioner Bedford said she is glad there is going to be a subcommittee to work on <br />the process of how projects are bought forward in the future. <br />Chair Rich said there is a difference between efficiency projects and climate mitigation <br />projects. She said the solar panels project is a climate mitigation project, which is what the tax <br />is for. <br />Commissioner Marcoplos said it is his understanding that every school board member <br />voted in favor of these projects. <br />Commissioner McKee said he has had off line conversations with the school board <br />members, and he stands by his comments and vote. <br />Commissioner Dorosin said this process started in January, and not two weeks ago. He <br />said if Commissioner McKee has other information he should share it in the BOCC meetings, as <br />it would be good to know. <br />Commissioner Price said she had conversations with school board members and chairs, <br />who initially felt out of the loop on this project, but now all seem to be on the same page. She <br />said she is glad the process will be reviewed. <br />Chair Rich said this project was discussed at school collaboration months ago, and the <br />schools had more than two weeks. <br />Commissioner McKee said he had conversations with school board members, and he <br />feels the two-week notice did back the schools into a corner. He said individual school board <br />members did not know details about these projects, nor did their staff. He said County staff <br />should have done a better job of raising it up the seniority ladder. <br /> <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Marcoplos, seconded by Commissioner Dorosin <br />for the Board to approve funding for the recommended Solar for Schools Grant program for FY <br />2019-20 as outlined in the attached report in the abstract with revisions. <br />