Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-23-2005-7b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2005
>
Agenda - 06-23-2005
>
Agenda - 06-23-2005-7b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 6:57:24 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:33:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/23/2005
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
7b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20050623
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ora_^_ge Ccunt_; Beard of Commissi~r_Ers <br />Page 5 <br />December 2, 2003 <br />-o <br />the arrua'~ :ot.dcet it s~.zbmits tc the board of county <br />CGm:m ]. EiOP_ErS "steal! requESt trc rate of ad ~: nlora-~ ta:c it <br />wis~~ES to have levied on its behalf as a school supplemental to=: <br />r~Ot ° ::.'ee'~.'"nCJ t'f'_e rate app l'O'Jed }J".; t11E ~iO ters." T1?c board Of <br />county cc~~mi.ssioners may approve c- disapprove the board of <br />educatior_ request. in whole or in part, and mar le~~;r a rate cf <br />SupDlE'.itE?='=a.L tax "as 1C ma"'/ flrid tO bE iP_ trE best 1nteYeSt Cf <br />the ta.cra_,;ers and tine public schools, not in excess of the rate <br />requested b-, the board of education." N.C" Gen. Scat, § 115C- <br />511(b) Ancl, it is unlawful fer any part of a supplemental ta.c <br />to bE used for purposes ether than authorized by the electior_. <br />N.C. GEn. Stat, § 115C-511(c). <br />Tine law rec~iires interpretation as to the responsibility of <br />the board of commissioners in a multi-school administrative unit <br />county where there is a county-wide supplemental tax in effect. <br />Presumably Each board of education would make a recommendation <br />for the county-wide supplemental ta:c.. If the request of the two <br />beards of education fo-r the rate of the county-wide district tax <br />are not the same, the lower rate requested is likely to be the <br />cap cn the board of county commissioner levy for that tax.. <br />The last important thing to mentior_ with respect to <br />supplemental tastes is how they differ from appropriations cf <br />county funds to boards of education fo-r current expense and <br />capital, As you know, the beard of cotuzty commissioners has wide <br />discretion in appropriating county funds to the boards of <br />education for both current e:cpensE and capital,- That discretion <br />allows "appropriation by purposE, function, or project as <br />defined in the uniform budget format" (a chart cf accounts <br />promulgated by the State Board cf Education). Pi..C. GEn. Stat. § <br />1150-12?(b). On the ether hand, supplemental ta:ces collected arE <br />not county appropriations to the board of education at all. <br />Pather, the fasces, once colleetecl, are fur_ds of the school <br />administrative units and "sha11 bE remitted to the local school <br />administrative n:nit[s] within 10 days after the close of each <br />calEndar month," Di, C. Gen. Stat. 3 115C-511(b), <br />'This discretion is limited, however, by the per-pupil <br />allocation required for current e:tpense and by statutory appeal <br />rights available to the boards of education concerning both <br />current expense appropriations and capital appropriations, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.